<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" 
	xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" >

<channel>
<title>Gordon And Mike's ICT Podcast</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com</link>
<description>Perspectives on the Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Industries and Education from Gordon F. Snyder, Jr. &amp;#38; Mike Qaissaunee</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>G Snyder and M Qaissaunee</copyright>
<managingEditor>gsnyder@stcc.edu</managingEditor>
<generator>Liberated Syndication - libsyn.com</generator>
<webMaster>podcasts@libsyn.com (Liberated Syndication)</webMaster>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:06:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>180</ttl>
<itunes:subtitle>Perspectives on Networks, Communications, Information Technology and Education</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary>National Center for Telecommunications Technologies Director Gordon F Snyder Jr and Mid Atlantic Institute for Telecommunications Technologies Director Mike Qaissaunee take a weekly look at the Networking, Information and Communications Technologies and how they affect the world of business, industry and education.</itunes:summary>
<itunes:category text="Technology" />
<itunes:keywords>Networks, Networking, Information Technology, Wireless, Broadband, Fiber Optics</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:owner>
<itunes:email>gsnyder@stcc.edu</itunes:email>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:explicit>Clean</itunes:explicit>
<item>
<title>Video Delivery and MPEG (Moving Pictures Experts Group) [26:30]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=349712#</link>
<description><![CDATA[

    
    


    
    
<font color="#ff0000" id="xume0" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Intro:</span> The Moving Picture Experts Group or MPEG, is a working group of ISO/IEC charged with the development of video and audio encoding standards. In
this podcast we look at the MPEG standards and video delivery systems.</font><br id="hut_6"/>
<br id="hut_7"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="xume1">Mike: Gordon, what sources are we referring to here?</font><br id="gv1h1"/><br/>Wikipedia and white paper from the MPEG Industry Forum at <span id="e2q40" class="a"><a title="www.m4if.org/public/documents/vault/m4-out-20027.pdf" id="zdx8" href="http://www.m4if.org/public/documents/vault/m4-out-20027.pdf">www.m4if.org/public/documents/vault/m4-out-20027.pdf</a>. we've also got a couple of diagrams from the Verizon website.</span><br id="hhao1"/>
<br id="hhao3"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="wcq60">Mike: What's the history of MPEG?</font><br id="exq30"/>
<br id="exq32"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="ox6s0">Mike: Are these open standards?</font><br id="j-is1"/>
<br id="wcq62"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="nfz60">Mike: What's the history? Can you tell us about MPEG-1?</font><br id="wcq63"/>
<br id="j-is4"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="kkky0">Mike: How about MPEG-2?</font><br id="a40b27"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="csnw1"><br id="csnw2"/>
Mike: We don't hear much about MPEG-3 - what's up with that?</font><br id="f8mt4"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="c5180"><br id="c5181"/>
Mike: Let's talk about MPEG-4 now.</font><br id="l3m33"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="duu-0"><br id="duu-1"/>
Mike: What are some of the advantages of MPEG-4?</font><br id="dok_2"/>
<br id="myqr0"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="hoab0">Mike: Let's switch gears and talk
about carried video delivery systems - specifically the telcos and
cable companies. How is this technology used?</font><br id="pdxf1"/><br/>It's different for broadcast and video on demand (VOD) content. Let's
discuss broadcast systems and look at how Verizon (as an example) is
setup.<br id="f12z0"/>
<br id="f12z1"/>
<div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="k8b4">
  <img width="772" height="446" src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddbv7xjh_313f27973fx_b" id="qpim0"/>
</div>
<br id="hoab1"/>
<br id="hoab2"/>
Two National Super Head Ends (SHE) - one in Tampa and the other in Bloomington, IL:<br id="h-gx0"/>
<br id="cmwi0"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="wv:t0">
  - Diversely located<br id="cmwi1"/>
  - Satellites collect video feeds<br id="cmwi2"/>
  - Video is converted to digital MPEG-2 and packaged in a 10-GigE payload<br id="cmwi3"/>
  -&nbsp; SHE servers âpitchâ data to the Video Hub Office (VHO)<br id="cmwi4"/>
  - Three OC-192 SONET (long haul) rings that drop and continue GigE to VHOs<br id="hoab3"/>
</div>
<br id="hoab4"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="h-gx1">Mike: What is OC-192?</font><br id="h-gx2"/>
<br id="pdxf3"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="rkcv0">Mike: OK, these video hub offices are distributed over Verizon's footprint - what happens when they get the video?</font><br id="rbqk1"/>
<br id="rbqk2"/>
Video Hub Office (VHO) ex. Burlington MA Combines:<br id="rbqk4"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="td:x0">
  - National Channels<br id="rbqk5"/>
  - VOD Servers âcatchâ data from the SHE servers<br id="rbqk6"/>
  - Off-Air, program guide, public, education, and government (PEG) channels, and local ads are injected<br id="rbqk7"/>
  - Encrypts all content<br id="rbqk8"/>
  - Content sent over several 1-GigE links to local Video Serving Offices (VSO, ex. CO) over SONET (medium haul)<br id="zr850"/>
  - VSO then sends it to the OLT and then to the&nbsp; PON network for delivery to customer.<br id="zr851"/>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="fyf00"><br id="zr853"/>
Mike: Broadcast is still done using traditional RF modulation methods - correct?</font><br id="s6yg0"/>
<br id="s6yg1"/>
Yes - that will change - rumor has it Verizon will be trialing IP Broadcasting this summer in Pennsylvania - just a rumor!<br id="zr854"/>

<font color="#ff0000" id="j62b0"><br id="fyf01"/>
Mike: Now - Video on Demand (VOD) does things a little differently - correct?</font><br id="fyf02"/>
<br id="fyf03"/>
Yes - VOD delivers IP content to the customer - it is not in RF format:<br id="k02t0"/>
<br id="k02t1"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="tvk90">
  - Content is requested by user via the IP network (private subnet)<br id="d_uu0"/>
  - Content is then streamed from the video pumps to the Video Distribution Routers (VDR) in the VHO (ex. Burlington)<br id="d_uu1"/>
  - VDR then sends 10-GigE links to a Video Aggregation Router (VAR)<br id="d_uu2"/>
  - The Video Aggregation Router (VAR) then sends it to the Gateway Router (GWR) in the VSO (ex. CO)<br id="d_uu3"/>
  - GWR then sends it to the OLT and then to the&nbsp; PON network<br id="d_uu4"/>
</div>
<br id="szb-0"/>
<br id="duu-20"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="szb-1">Mike: So - Verizon is combining Voice, Video and Data services on the same fiber?</font><br id="q7kc0"/>
<br id="q7kc1"/>
Yes - Here's another nice diagram from the Verizon website:<br id="szb-2"/>
<div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="szq3">
  <img style="width: 648px; height: 212px;" src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddbv7xjh_314dtv8h4c8_b" id="hexe0"/>
</div>
<br id="q7kc3"/>
<br id="duu-21"/>
<br id="a40b51"/>
<br id="a40b52"/>]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=349712#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/MPEG_Final.mp3" length="25435411" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:26:30</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>MPEG, Motion Picture Expert Group, SONET, OC, Optical Carrier, WDM, Fiber Optics, Communications, Compression, MPEG-2, MPEG-4</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>he Moving Picture Experts Group or MPEG, is a working group of ISO/IEC charged with the development of video and audio encoding</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>Passive Optical Networks (PONs)  [24:24]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=344361#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv5"><font color="#ff0000" id="pxmv6"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv7"><font color="#000000" id="ia5j1"><u id="g-fi0"><b id="g-fi1">Intro</b></u>:
In this podcast we take a look at modern fiber delivery systems.</font> </font></font>
</p>


<b id="d68g1"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv90"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv91"><u id="g-fi2"><br id="pn-a0"/>
Podcast Questions</u>:</font></font></b>


<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv89"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv90"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv91">Mike:
Passive Optical Networks use Fiber â could you talk a little
but about Fiber to the Premise or Home (FTTP or H)</font></font></p>






<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv96"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv97"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv98">Mike: So what exactly is a Fiber P2P Network?</font></font></p>



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv105"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv106"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv107">Mike:
OK, so whatâs a PON?</font></font></p>



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv115"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv116"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv117">Mike:
What are the PON Architectural Choices?</font></font></p>




<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv120"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv121"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv122">Mike:
What is Centralized Splitting?</font></font></p>



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv151"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" color="#000000" id="pxmv152"><font id="pxmv153">Mike:
What is Distributed/Cascaded Splitting?</font></font></p>




<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv168"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv169"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv170">Mike:
What are some of the Protocols and Standards used with PONs?</font></font></p>




<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv203"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv204"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv205">Mike:
What are the Outside Plant Components?</font></font></p>



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv228"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" color="#000000" id="pxmv229"><font id="pxmv230">Mike:
Whatâs an ONT?</font></font></p>



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv243"><font color="#000000" id="pxmv244"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv245">Mike:
Are Technicians typically terminating fiber in the field?</font></font></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv10"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" color="#cc0000" id="pxmv11"><b id="ia5j2"><font color="#000000" id="ia5j3"><u id="g-fi5"><br/></u></font></b></font></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv10"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" color="#cc0000" id="pxmv11"><b id="ia5j2"><font color="#000000" id="ia5j3"><u id="g-fi5">Reference List</u>:</font></b><br id="pwq30"/>
</font></p>








<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv20"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv21"><i id="pxmv22"><u id="pxmv15"><b id="pxmv16">FiOS:
Our Future</b></u><br/>James
Armstrong, Chris Cote, Stan McCoy, James Todd<br/>STCC
Verizon NextStep Class of 2008</i></font></p>








<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv20"><u id="pxc90"><b id="pxc91"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv21"><i id="pxmv22">Passive Optical Network Splitter</i></font></b></u><br/><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv21"><i id="pxmv22">Lawrence Graham, Mike Thompson, Jodi Lewandowski, Jeremy Dillensneider, Stephen Booher<br/>STCC
Verizon NextStep Class of 2006</i></font></p>









<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" class="western" id="pxmv36"><i id="pxmv26"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv27"><b id="pxmv28"><u id="pxmv29">FTTH
Explained: Delivering efficient customer bandwidth and enhanced
services</u></b></font></i><br/><a href="http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/fiber_home/" id="pxmv31"><u id="pxmv32"><i id="pxmv33"><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv34"><font color="#009999" id="pxmv35">http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/fiber_home/</font></font></i></u></a><br/><font face="Arial, sans-serif" id="pxmv37"><i id="pxmv38">Michael
Kunigonis, Product Line Manager: Access Corning Cable Systems</i></font></p>


]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=344361#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/PONs.mp3" length="23421683" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:24:24</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>FiOS, Passive Optical Networks, Fiber Optics, Point to Point Networks, PON, P2P, Communications, Voice, Video, Data</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>In this podcast we take a look at modern fiber delivery systems.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Amazon Kindle First Impressions [30:10]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=332035#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<font color="#990000" id="e9rt">Intro</font>: Amazon launched the Kindle in the United
States in November 2007. Demand for the Kindle has been high with long
waiting lists. We finally got our hands on one and review the Kindle in
this podcast.<br/><br/>Show Questions: <br/><br/><font color="#cc0000" id="cmo6"><font color="#000000" id="ctrz">Can you give us some basic specs on the Kindle?</font></font><font color="#000000" id="griu"><br id="y5j5"/>
</font><p id="ym6k">
  <font color="#000000" id="sr4z" class="Apple-style-span">What about external storage, battery life and ports or connectors?</font><font color="#000000" id="ay-l">&nbsp; <br id="g8-0"/>
</font></p>


<font color="#000000" id="vzun">C</font><font color="#000000" id="cmo6">an you give us a quick overview on the Kindle controls - How do you use it?</font><font color="#000000" id="kqtk"><br id="q9:2"/>
</font>
<div id="jw_h">
  <font color="#000000" id="qegc"><br id="w1h-"/>
</font>
</div>
<div id="ew3c">
  <font color="#000000" id="dkjs" class="Apple-style-span">How do you navigate?</font>
</div>

<div id="ifi:">
  <font color="#000000" id="wl48"><br id="jimi"/>
</font>
</div>
<div id="ifi:">
  <font color="#000000" id="beia" class="Apple-style-span"> Does the ruler do anything else?</font><font color="#000000" id="dujb"><br id="vsu_"/>
</font>
  <font color="#000000" id="vow9"><br id="q5x3"/>
What's Whispernet?</font><font color="#000000" id="nk2g"><br id="vxz8"/>
<br id="s-k9"/>
</font><font color="#000000" id="zrwa">How do you get content on the Kindle?</font><font color="#000000" id="vy0l"><br id="a7vs"/>
<br id="jbd7"/>
</font>
  
</div>
<div id="ifi:">
  <font color="#000000" id="q.e2" class="Apple-style-span">Can you get content from other sources?</font></div><div id="ifi:"><font color="#000000" id="cbnp"><br id="y-ux"/>
</font></div><div id="ifi:"><font color="#000000" id="hn1n" class="Apple-style-span">What file formats does the kindle support?</font><font color="#000000" id="ao2_"><br id="fl27"/>
<br id="fcnq"/>
</font><font color="#000000" id="oh8s">Are there other ways to read pdf's? </font><font color="#000000" id="l2.t"><br id="v8q5"/>
</font>
  <font color="#000000" id="se7t"><br id="c3vr"/>Can you view pictures?</font><font color="#000000" id="ot8u"><br id="puye"/>
</font>
  <font color="#000000" id="fuhv"><br id="ebqw"/>What else can you do?</font><font color="#000000" id="tj6i"><br id="stuc"/>
</font></div><div id="ifi:"><font color="#000000" id="jd1b"><br id="r6d:"/>
</font></div><div id="ifi:"><font color="#000000" id="hu:t" class="Apple-style-span">I'm always reading things and making notes to include in blogs or other documents - is there a way to do this?</font><font color="#000000" id="u0wz"><br id="hom1"/>
</font></div><div id="ifi:"><font color="#000000" id="j31p"><br id="beax"/>
</font></div><font color="#000000" id="g:3f" class="Apple-style-span">Is content on the kindle searchable?</font><font color="#000000" id="q0rm"><br id="nh-d"/>
</font>
  
  <font color="#000000" id="tbtp">
  <br id="s-69"/>
How does the dictionary work?<br id="yw.l"/>
  <br id="jvud"/>
What are some of the experimental extras - does it allow web browsing??</font><font color="#000000" id="i3.3"><br id="t772"/>
</font>
  <font color="#000000" id="effk"><br id="av9n"/>I've heard about a question ask and answer feature - can you describe that?</font><font color="#000000" id="pu31"><br id="xo4r"/>
</font>
  <font color="#000000" id="s0.q"><br id="o9i:"/>Can you play music on it?</font><font color="#000000" id="zl_."><br id="auva"/>
  <br id="zh1e"/>Any other observations?</font><br id="dcpn"/>
  ]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=332035#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/Kindle_Final.mp3" length="28962150" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:30:10</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Kindle, Amazon, eInk, eBook, Reader, electronic book</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>Amazon launched the Kindle in the United States in November 2007. Demand for the Kindle has been high with long waiting lists.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) Details Podcast [32:30]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=324590#</link>
<description><![CDATA[

    
    
<font color="#ff0000" id="zemz">Intro: <font color="#000000" id="dyhq">Two weeks ago we gave an overview of IPv6. This week we take a look at some of the technical details for this protocol.</font></font><br id="jk7l"/>
<br id="cfqk"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="k2on"><br id="x3hd"/>
Mike: Gordon, a couple of weeks ago we discussed Ipv6 - can you give us
a quick review - what's the difference between IPv4 and IPv6?</font><br id="brls"/>
<br id="q-xc"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="tcsg">
The most obvious distinguishing feature of IPv6 is its use of much
larger addresses. The size of an address in IPv6 is 128 bits, which is
four times the larger than an IPv4 address. A 32-bit address space
allows for 2</span><sup id="n1gv" style="font-style: italic;">32</sup><span style="font-style: italic;" id="zpam"> or 4,294,967,296 possible addresses. A 128-bit address space allows for 2</span><sup id="c31g" style="font-style: italic;"> 28</sup><span style="font-style: italic;" id="pb5g"> or 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 (or 3.4x10</span><sup id="qe0v" style="font-style: italic;">38</sup><span style="font-style: italic;" id="jevi">) possible addresses.</span><br id="z36b" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="je-0" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="w1rc">
In the late 1970s when the IPv4 address space was designed, it was
unimaginable that it could be exhausted. However, due to changes in
technology and an allocation practice that did not anticipate the
recent explosion of hosts on the Internet, the IPv4 address space was
consumed to the point that by 1992 it was clear a replacement would be
necessary.</span><br id="ae9q" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="l4om">
With IPv6, it is even harder to conceive that the IPv6 address space will be consumed.</span><br id="qzji"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="s6vl"><br/><br id="gyzq"/>
Mike: It's not just to have more addresses though, is it?</font><br id="mo2m"/>
<br id="yux9"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="gaz3">
It is important to remember that the decision to make the IPv6 address
128 bits in length was not so that every square inch of the Earth could
have 4.3x10</span><sup id="vc5t" style="font-style: italic;">20</sup><span style="font-style: italic;" id="ftr-">
addresses. Rather, the relatively large size of the IPv6 address is
designed to be subdivided into hierarchical routing domains that
reflect the topology of the modern-day Internet. The use of 128 bits
allows for multiple levels of hierarchy and flexibility in designing
hierarchical addressing and routing that is currently lacking on the
IPv4-based Internet.</span><br id="mr4w"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="w.7b"><br/><br id="x02g"/>
Mike: Is there a specific RFC for IPv6?</font><br id="dpip"/>
<br id="nt11" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="cm70">
The IPv6 addressing architecture is described in </span><a title="RFC 2373" id="s6tq" href="http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2373.html" style="font-style: italic;">RFC 2373</a><span style="font-style: italic;" id="g1g5">.</span><br id="li2m"/>
<br/><br id="jb9q"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="o0os">Mike: I know there is some basic terminology associated with IPv6. Can you describe Nodes and Interfaces as they apply to IPv6?<br id="o:2k"/>
<br id="xr8p" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<font color="#000000" id="oy-3"><span style="font-style: italic;" id="rb-8">A </span><span id="gdu:" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="sbqx">node</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="y_vs">
is any device that implements IPv6. It can be a router, which is a
device that forwards packets that aren't directed specifically to it,
or a host, which is a node that doesn't forward packets.</span><br id="wwli" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="quf2" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="itys">
An </span><span id="ag-x" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="y3b6">interface</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="idpz"> is the connection to a transmission medium through which IPv6 packets are sent.</span><br id="w635"/>
<br id="z5wf"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="msnr"><br id="yw06"/>
</font></font></font><font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn">Mike: How about some more IPv6 terminology - can you discuss Links, Neighbors, Link MTUs, and Link Layer Addresses?<br id="ibff"/>
<font color="#000000" id="g5v6"><br id="sipz"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="oh3l">
A </span><span id="g:50" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="unhn">link</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="s488"> is the medium over which IPv6 is carried. </span><span id="xch2" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="gw83">Neighbors</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="lan_"> are nodes that are connected to the same link.</span><br id="f9j:" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="bwa0" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="c_9k">
A l</span><span id="luel" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="ldim">ink maximum transmission unit (MTU) </b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="i1vm">is the maximum packet size that can be carried over a given link medium, and is expressed in octets.</span><br id="so:j" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="v215" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="ouqy">
A </span><span id="ukk3" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="o9j5">Link Layer address</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="tt5l"> is the &quot;physical&quot; address of an interface, such as media access control (MAC) addresses for Ethernet links.</span><br id="nj_3"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="p65l"><br id="ajs5"/>
<br id="n7.1"/>
Mike: Can you give a brief ouline in address syntax?</font><br id="a-6r"/>
<br id="lcf6"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="rk_i">
IPv4 addresses are represented in dotted-decimal format. This 32-bit
address is divided along 8-bit boundaries. Each set of 8 bits is
converted to its decimal equivalent and separated by periods.</span><br id="gxck" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="nf2a" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="vdjs">
For IPv6, the 128-bit address is divided along 16-bit boundaries, and
each 16-bit block is converted to a 4-digit hexadecimal number and
separated by colons. The resulting representation is called
colon-hexadecimal.</span><br id="qvye" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="e6t:" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="vw-j">
The following is an IPv6 address in binary form:</span><br id="u3lw" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="teos" style="font-style: italic;"/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="o.bc">
  <font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6">00100001110110100000000011010011000000000000000000101111001110110000001010101010000000001111111111111110001010001001110001011010</font></font><br id="xg39"/>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn" style="font-style: italic;"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6"><br id="j4xi"/>
The 128-bit address is divided along 16-bit boundaries:<br id="j833"/>
<br id="wglx"/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="j7l3">
  <font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6">0010000111011010&nbsp;
0000000011010011&nbsp;&nbsp; 0000000000000000&nbsp;&nbsp; 0010111100111011&nbsp;
0000001010101010&nbsp;&nbsp; 0000000011111111&nbsp;&nbsp; 1111111000101000&nbsp;
1001110001011010&nbsp; </font></font><br id="yeuw"/>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn" style="font-style: italic;"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6">&nbsp;<br id="f54i"/>
Each 16-bit block is converted to hexadecimal and delimited with colons. The result is:<br id="uekn"/>
<br id="yz5l"/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="l_fo">
  <font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6">21DA:00D3:0000:2F3B:02AA:00FF:FE28:9C5A</font></font><br id="hp-g"/>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn" style="font-style: italic;"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6"><br id="k-4j"/>
IPv6 representation can be further simplified by removing the leading
zeros within each 16-bit block. However, each block must have at least
a single digit. With leading zero suppression, the address
representation becomes:<br id="svjb"/>
<br id="ezmh"/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="yjl7">
  <font color="#ff0000" id="f4jn"><font color="#000000" id="g5v6"><span style="font-style: italic;" id="hqb:">21DA:D3:0:2F3B:2AA:FF:FE28:9C5A</span><br id="qvxi"/>
  </font></font>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="ak6."><br id="jjkt"/>
<br id="fkii"/>
Mike: I know there are lost of zeros in IPv6 addresses - can you discribe zero compression notation?</font><br id="mgn0"/>
<br id="ga.p"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="lpzi">
Some types of addresses contain long sequences of zeros. To further
simplify the representation of IPv6 addresses, a contiguous sequence of
16-bit blocks set to 0 in the colon hexadecimal format can be
compressed to â::â?, known as double-colon.</span><br id="fp97" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="t2-m" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="thul">
For example, the link-local address of FE80:0:0:0:2AA:FF:FE9A:4CA2 can
be compressed to FE80::2AA:FF:FE9A:4CA2. The multicast address
FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:2 can be compressed to FF02::2.</span><br id="u_0j" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="fcwt" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="kf5q">
Zero compression can only be used to compress a single contiguous
series of 16-bit blocks expressed in colon hexadecimal notation. You
cannot use zero compression to include part of a 16-bit block. For
example, you cannot express FF02:30:0:0:0:0:0:5 as FF02:3::5. The
correct representation is FF02:30::5.</span><br id="vmkw" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="qvbv" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="d1rt">
To determine how many 0 bits are represented by the â::â?, you can count
the number of blocks in the compressed address, subtract this number
from 8, and then multiply the result by 16. For example, in the address
FF02::2, there are two blocks (the âFF02â? block and the â2â? block.) The
number of bits expressed by the â::â? is 96 (96 = (8 â 2)(16).</span><br id="vqyr" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="igph" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="xbln">
Zero compression can only be used once in a given address. Otherwise,
you could not determine the number of 0 bits represented by each
instance of â::â?.</span><br id="e5ux"/>
<br id="xkf5"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="szqu"><br id="qvlz"/>
</font>
<div id="yjl7">
  <font color="#ff0000" id="gchf">Mike: IPv4 addresses use subnet masks - do IPv6 addresses?</font><br id="p33:"/>
  <br id="q92r"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="e3cd">
  No - a subnet mask is not used for IPv6. Something called prefix length notation is supported.</span><br id="e4_j" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br id="bny_" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="vei6">
The prefix is the part of the address that indicates the bits that have
fixed values or are the bits of the network identifier. Prefixes for
IPv6 subnet identifiers, routes, and address ranges are expressed in
the same way as Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) notation for
IPv4. An IPv6 prefix is written in address/prefix-length notation. For
example, 21DA:D3::/48 is a route prefix and 21DA:D3:0:2F3B::/64 is a
subnet prefix.</span><br id="o365"/>
  <br id="udhs"/>
  <font color="#ff0000" id="x:-l"><br id="gokr"/>
  Mike: I know there are three basic types of IPv6 addresses - can you give a brief description of each?</font><br id="oz9r"/>
  <br id="e_zj" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="zytk">
  1. </span><span id="pd10" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="fb9x">Unicast</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="uos-"> â packet sent to a particular interface</span><br id="eik1" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="ng2m">
A unicast address identifies a single interface within the scope of the
type of unicast address. With the appropriate unicast routing topology,
packets addressed to a unicast address are delivered to a single
interface. To accommodate load-balancing systems, RFC 2373 allows for
multiple interfaces to use the same address as long as they appear as a
single interface to the IPv6 implementation on the host.<br id="a-i6"/>
  </div>
  <br id="se0z" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="slvx">
  2. </span><span id="neqi" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="bjks">Multicast</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="f8:5"> - packet sent to a set of interfaces, typically encompassing multiple nodes</span><br id="jxgh" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="le7l">
A multicast address identifies multiple interfaces. With the
appropriate multicast routing topology, packets addressed to a
multicast address are delivered to all interfaces that are identified
by the address.<br id="jw5m"/>
    <br id="i36-"/>
  </div><span style="font-style: italic;" id="frja">
  3. </span><span id="ry-f" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="t_ab">Anycast</b></span><span style="font-style: italic;" id="p-w3">
â while identifying multiple interfaces (and typically multiple nodes)
is sent only to the interface that is determined to be ânearestâ? to the
sender.</span><br id="mi1i" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="f0h-">
An anycast address identifies multiple interfaces. With the appropriate
routing topology, packets addressed to an anycast address are delivered
to a single interface, the nearest interface that is identified by the
address. The ânearestâ? interface is defined as being closest in terms
of routing distance. A multicast address is used for one-to-many
communication, with delivery to multiple interfaces. An anycast address
is used for one-to-one-of-many communication, with delivery to a single
interface.<br id="u010"/>
  </div>
  <br id="e5wa" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="gay4">
In all cases, IPv6 addresses identify interfaces, not nodes. A node is
identified by any unicast address assigned to one of its interfaces.</span><br id="q4dl"/>
  <br id="ok70"/>
  <font color="#ff0000" id="n6bx"><br id="jfn2"/>
  Mike: What about broadcasting?</font><br id="dyvm"/>
  <br id="i46v"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="dh_a">
RFC 2373 does not define a broadcast address. All types of IPv4
broadcast addressing are performed in IPv6 using multicast addresses.
For example, the subnet and limited broadcast addresses from IPv4 are
replaced with the link-local scope all-nodes multicast address of
FF02::1.</span><br id="h5bg"/>
  <br id="s648"/>
  <br id="eajr"/>
  <font color="#ff0000" id="fm1_">Mike: What about special addresses?</font><br id="m7gu"/>
  <br id="csvr"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="sk:h">
  The following are special IPv6 addresses:</span><br id="kxo7" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br id="mbr1" style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="rhae">
    <span id="h636" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="m7pz">Unspecified Address</b></span><br id="h004" style="font-style: italic;"/>
    <div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="qt4q">
The unspecified address (0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 or ::) is only used to
indicate the absence of an address. It is equivalent to the IPv4
unspecified address of 0.0.0.0. The unspecified address is typically
used as a source address for packets attempting to verify the
uniqueness of a tentative address. The unspecified address is never
assigned to an interface or used as a destination address.<br id="ot36"/>
      <br id="c1r1"/>
    </div>
    <span id="bqfr" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="czdi">Loopback Address</b></span><br id="d0kz" style="font-style: italic;"/>
    <div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="ar.o"><span style="font-style: italic;" id="lb4n">
The loopback address (0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 or ::1) is used to identify a
loopback interface, enabling a node to send packets to itself. It is
equivalent to the IPv4 loopback address of 127.0.0.1. Packets addressed
to the loopback address must never be sent on a link or forwarded by an
IPv6 router.</span><br id="cf2v"/>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="yjl7">
</div>
<br id="hg_q"/>
<br id="x2g5"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="lrk4">Mike: How is DNS handled?</font><br id="o3mx"/>
<br id="t1yt"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="kp1.">
Enhancements to the Domain Name System (DNS) for IPv6 are described in RFC 1886 and consist of the following new elements:</span><br id="o:hg" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="cdep" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="w:6h">
  Host address (AAAA) resource record<br id="jy0:"/>
  IP6.ARPA domain for reverse queries<br id="jwnh"/>
</div>
<br id="axyp" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="urxo">
Note:&nbsp; According to RFC 3152, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
consensus has been reached that the IP6.ARPA domain be used, instead of
IP6.INT as defined in RFC 1886. The IP6.ARPA domain is the domain used
by IPv6 for Windows Server 2003.</span><br id="dif7" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="tha0" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<span id="wa21" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="txap">The Host Address (AAAA) Resource Record:</b></span><br id="x5a7" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="aq16" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="v213"> A new
DNS resource record type, AAAA (called âquad Aâ?), is used for resolving
a fully qualified domain name to an IPv6 address. It is comparable to
the host address (A) resource record used with IPv4. The resource
record type is named AAAA (Type value of 28) because 128-bit IPv6
addresses are four times as large as 32-bit IPv4 addresses. The
following is an example of a AAAA resource record:<br id="xcoc"/>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="lt.a">
  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; host1.microsoft.com&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; IN&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; AAAA&nbsp;&nbsp; FEC0::2AA:FF:FE3F:2A1C<br id="w-da"/>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="sr20"> A host
must specify either a AAAA query or a general query for a specific host
name in order to receive IPv6 address resolution data in the DNS query
answer sections.<br id="qx4y"/>
</div>
<br id="nv3b" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<span id="h3ra" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="qygj">The IP6.ARPA Domain</b></span><br id="np93" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="getb" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="knt2"> The
IP6.ARPA domain has been created for IPv6 reverse queries. Also called
pointer queries, reverse queries determine a host name based on the IP
address. To create the namespace for reverse queries, each hexadecimal
digit in the fully expressed 32-digit IPv6 address becomes a separate
level in inverse order in the reverse domain hierarchy.<br id="xb1o"/><br id="pk2l"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="b95b">For example, the reverse
lookup domain name for the address FEC0::2AA:FF:FE3F:2A1C (fully
expressed as FEC0:0000:0000:0000:02AA: 00FF:FE3F:2A1C) is:<br id="l_ox"/>
</div>

  <div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="y8.1">
    C.1.A.2.F.3.E.F.F.F.0.0.A.A.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.C.E.F.IP6.ARPA.<br id="ckak"/>
  </div>
</div>
<br id="f:jo" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="uvum">The
DNS support described in RFC 1886 represents a simple way to both map
host names to IPv6 addresses and provide reverse name resolution.</span><br id="k9:_" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="i1ro"/>
<br id="j9nr"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="bu_r">Mike: Can you discuss transition from IPv4 to IPv6?</font><br id="tdm2"/>
<br id="r9o8" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="wxhp">
Mechanisms for transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 are defined in </span><a title="RFC 1933" id="rljp" href="http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1933.html" style="font-style: italic;">RFC 1933</a><span style="font-style: italic;" id="vvp9">.
The primary goal in the transition process is a successful coexistence
of the two protocol versions until such time as IPv4 can be retired if,
indeed, it's ever completely decommissioned. Transition plans fall into
two primary categories: dual-stack implementation, and IPv6 over IPv4
tunneling.</span><br id="cfjd" style="font-style: italic;"/><span style="font-style: italic;" id="x778">
More Info Mechanisms for transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 are defined in RFC 1933. There are two primary methods.</span><br id="kswg" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<br id="e-xk" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<span id="ti:d" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="wgj9">Dual Stack Implementation</b></span><br id="g9hl" style="font-style: italic;"/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px; font-style: italic;" id="df4_"> The
simplest method for providing IPv6 functionality allows the two IP
versions to be implemented as a dual stack on each node. Nodes using
the dual stack can communicate via either stack. While dual-stack nodes
can use IPv6 and IPv4 addresses that are related to each other, this
isn't a requirement of the implementation, so the two addresses can be
totally disparate. These nodes also can perform tunneling of IPv6 over
IPv4. Because each stack is fully functional, the nodes can configure
their IPv6 addresses via stateless autoconfiguration or DHCP for IPv6,
while configuring their IPv4 addresses via any of the current
configuration methods.<br id="lesm"/>
</div>
<br style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" id="g1v8"/>
<span id="q35s" style="font-style: italic;"><b id="mb9j">IPv6 Over IPv4 Tunneling<br id="tcsk"/>
</b></span>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;" id="twae">
  <span id="q35s" style="font-style: italic;">The
second method for implementing IPv6 in an IPv4 environment is by
tunneling IPv6 packets within IPv4 packets. These nodes can map an IPv4
address into an IPv4-compatible IPv6 address, preceding the IPv4
address with a 96-bit &quot;0:0:0:0:0:0&quot; prefix. Routers on a network don't
need to immediately be IPv6-enabled if this approach is used, but
Domain Name System (DNS) servers on a mixed-version network must be
capable of supporting both versions of the protocol. To help achieve
this goal, a new record type, &quot;AAAA,&quot; has been defined for IPv6
addresses. Because Windows 2000 DNS servers implement this record type
as well as the IPv4 &quot;A&quot; record, IPv6 can be easily implemented in a
Windows 2000 environment.</span><br id="n2r2"/>
</div>
<div id="df4_">
  <br id="cpfa"/>
</div>
<font color="#ff0000" id="xpv_"><br id="y0b."/>
Mike: we've only touched on some of the IPv6 details - where can people get more information?</font><br id="f0fi"/>
<br id="hdeo"/>
I'm hoping to run a session at our summer conference <b id="vq6t"> July 28 - 31 </b>in Austin, TX - we've currently got faculty fellowships available to cover the cost of the conference. See <a title="www.nctt.org" id="k-0." href="http://www.nctt.org/">www.nctt.org</a> for details.<br id="e_xu"/>
<br id="fcpb"/>
<br id="gzvl"/>
<font color="#ff0000" id="w-gl" style="font-weight: bold;">References - Content for this academic podcast from Microsoft sources:</font><br id="r47t"/>
<br id="t.ci"/>
All Linked Documents at Microsoft Internet Protocol Version 6 (note: <span style="font-weight: bold;" id="nnux">excellent</span> and free online resources): <a id="zkof" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb530961.aspx" title="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb530961.aspx">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb530961.aspx</a> <br id="exuh"/>
<br id="k.bi"/>
Understanding IPv6, Joseph Davies, Microsoft Press, 2002<br id="xf22"/>
ISBN: 0-7356-1245-5<br id="rsyb"/>
Sample Chapter at: <a id="tllh" href="http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/4883.asp#SampleChapter" title="http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/4883.asp#SampleChapter">http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/4883.asp#SampleChapter</a> <br id="xt.d"/>
<br/>]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=324590#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/IPv6_Details_FINAL.mp3" length="31202829" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:32:30</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Internet Protocol version 6, IPv6, protocol, Internet Protocol, IP, Communications, Networks, Telecommunications</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>We discuss some of the technical details for IPv6.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>The FCC 700 MHz Auction Results [17:10]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=320408#</link>
<description><![CDATA[

    
    


    
    
<font color="#ff0000">Intro: On March 18, <a id="jpl7" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=73" title="FCC Auction 73">FCC Auction 73</a> b<span class="cr_artbody">idding round 261 ended and, after 38 days and </span><span class="cr_artbody">$19.592 billion</span></font><span class="cr_artbody"><font color="#ff0000">
in bids (almost double the $10 billion the FCC had hoped for), the FCC
closed out the auction. In this podcast we review and discuss the
auction results.</font><br/><br/><br/></span><font color="#ff0000">Mike: Gordon, can you give us an overview of the auction results?</font><br/><br/>Sure Mike - this comes from the <a id="fa2_" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=73" title="FCC auction website">FCC auction website</a> linked up in the shownotes.<br/><br/><div class="evenRow" style="margin-left: 40px;">

<div class="colLast"><i>Rounds: 261 (started on 1/24 and ended on 3/18)<br/></i></div>
</div>
<div class="evenRow" style="margin-left: 40px;">

<div class="colLast"><i>Bidding Days: 38</i></div>
</div>
<div class="evenRow" style="margin-left: 40px;">

<div class="colLast"><i>Qualified Bidders: 214</i></div>
</div>
<div class="evenRow" style="margin-left: 40px;">

<div class="colLast"><i>Winning Bidders: 101 Bidders won 1090 Licenses</i></div>
</div><div class="evenRow" style="margin-left: 40px;"><div class="colLast"><br/></div>
</div>
<div class="evenRow">
<div class="colLast">
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">
			
			
</div><form name="results73" action="https://auctionbidding.fcc.gov/login/publicLogin.htm" method="post" target="_blank" style="margin-left: 40px;">
				
<i>
				*Auction 73 concluded with 1090 provisionally winning bids covering 1091 licenses and totaling $19,592,420,000, </i><i>as shown in the Integrated Spectrum Auction System</i><i>.
The provisionally winning bids for the A, B, C, and E Block licenses
exceeded the aggregate reserve prices for those blocks. The
provisionally winning bid for the D Block license, however, did not
meet the applicable reserve price and thus did not become a winning
bid. Accordingly, Auction 73 raised a total of $19,120,378,000 in
winning bids and $18,957,582,150 in net winning bids (reflecting
bidders' claimed bidding credit eligibility), as shown above.</i> </form>
		

</div>
</div><br/><font color="#ff0000">Mike: Before we get into the auction
results, can you give us an overview of the different spectrum blocks?
I know we've done this before but - how about a quick refresher?</font><br/><br/>Sure Mike - this comes from a <a id="gm6k" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2008/01/fcc-spectrum-auction-whats-going-on.html" title="blog I wrote back on January 14">blog I wrote back on January 14</a>.<br/><p style="margin-left: 40px;">Back in 2005 Congress passed a law that requires all U.S. TV
stations to convert to all digital broadcasts and give up analog
spectrum in the 700 MHz frequency band. This law will free up 62 MHz of
spectrum in the 700 MHz band and effectively eliminate channels between
52 and 69. This <a id="bpmt" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2007/09/analog-to-digital-mandated-conversion.html" title="conversion">conversion</a>, which has a deadline of February 18, 2009, has freed up spectrum that is being split up by the FCC into five blocks:</p>
<ul style="margin-left: 40px;"><li>A-Block - 12 MHz, split up into 176 smaller economic areas<br/></li><li>B-Block - 12 MHz,  split up into 734 cellular market areas<br/></li><li>C-Block - 22 MHz, up into 12 regional licenses<br/></li><li>D-Block - 10MHz, combined with approximately 10MHz allocated for public safety, a single national license.<br/></li><li>E-Block - 6 MHz, split up into 176 smaller economic areas</li></ul>
So in summary, each spectrum block in the 700 MHz
auction, except for the national public safely D-Block, has been
assigned an area designation by the FCC. <br/>All FCC areas, along with names, county lists, maps and map info data can be found on the Commission's website linked <a id="qsl9" href="http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/areas/" title="here">here.</a><br/><span class="post-icons"><span class="item-action"><font color="#ff0000"><br/><br/>Mike: How about a quick review of the D-Block again?</font><br/><br/></span></span>Sure Mike, this also comes from that January 14 blog:<br/><p style="margin-left: 40px;">The D-Block lately has been most interesting to watch. Early on it appeared <a id="jgc6" href="http://www.frontlinewireless.com/" title="Frontline Wireless">Frontline Wireless</a>
would be one of the biggest bidders for D-Block spectrum - the company
was setup for D-Block and had worked closely with the FCC on putting
together specifications for the spectrum. Frontline built a <a id="vh8-" href="http://www.frontlinewireless.com/team.php" title="formidable team">formidable team</a> including Vice Chairman <a id="kv43" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Hundt" title="Reed Hundt">Reed Hundt</a><b>, </b>who
served as Chairman of the FCC between 1993 and 1997. The business plan,
the organization, the technology seemed to all be in place........ On
January 12 the company placed the following statement on their website:</p>
 <p style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>Frontline Wireless is closed for business at this time.  We have no further comment.</i></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">Another company, <a id="xoza" href="http://www.cyrencall.com/" title="Cyren Call">Cyren Call</a> also looked like they were planning to bid on the D-Block Auction but did not.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">What
happen? Rumor has it Frontline could not attract enough funders - it
seemed like a good investment - or at least you may think so up front.
Many are now asking if the FCC's approach to solving the public safety
inter-operability problem is in trouble. </p>
<font color="#ff0000">
<br/>Mike: OK, how about the results?<br/><br/><font color="#000000">Here's a summary from the <a id="mdiq" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120603843805652459.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" title="Wall Street Journal">Wall Street Journal</a>:</font></font><br/><p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Verizon
and AT&amp;T accounted for 80% of the nearly $20 billion AT&amp;T
agreed to pay $6.6 billion for 227 spectrum licenses in markets
covering much of the country. Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of </i><a href="http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=VZ" class="times rolloverQuote"><i>Verizon Communications</i></a><i> Inc. and </i><a href="http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&symbol=vod" class="times rolloverQuote"><i>Vodafone Group</i></a><i> PLC, won 109 licenses for $9.4 billion.</i></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Dish Network Corp., which bid for spectrum through Frontier Wireless
LLC, did acquire a significant footprint, winning 168 licenses
throughout the country for $712 million. Satellite-TV providers are
looking for a way into the high-speed Internet business to better
compete with cable and phone companies. But Credit Suisse analyst Chris
Larsen said in a research note that the particular segment of spectrum
Dish acquired would make it difficult for the company to offer
interactive wireless broadband service. He said the company could use
the spectrum to broadcast data or for on-demand video.</i></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Google had indicated interest in a nationwide package of licenses
before the auction, but it bid just high enough to trigger rules that
will force winners of one segment of spectrum, known as the C-block, to
allow any mobile devices and applications on their networks. Verizon
won the lion's share of spectrum in this segment. Google had pushed for
the regulation since its efforts to sell some mobile services had been
stymied by major carriers, which traditionally have strictly limited
the kinds of devices that consumers could use on their networks. Even
before the auction had wrapped up, Google scored a victory as Verizon
voluntarily agreed to open its network to devices it doesn't sell
through its own retail network. Verizon released details of its new
policy on Wednesday.</i></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i><br/></i></p>
<p><span class="cr_artbody"><font color="#ff0000">Mike: Were there any licenses that dod not get any bids?</font><br/></span><span class="cr_artbody"><br/></span><span class="cr_artbody">There were 1,099 licenses auctioned and only eight did not receive any bids:<br/></span></p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i>A-Block:</i></span> <div style="margin-left: 40px; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><span class="cr_artbody"><i>Lubbock, Texas</i></span><br/><span class="cr_artbody"><i>Wheeling, W.Va.<br/><br/></i></span></div> <span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i>B-Block:</i></span> <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i>Bismarck, N.D.<br/>Fargo, N.D.<br/>Grand Forks, N.D.</i></span> <span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i><br/>Lee, Va.</i></span> <span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i><br/>Yancey, N.C.</i></span> <span class="cr_artbody" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"><i><br/>Clarendon, S.C.</i></span><br/></div></div><span class="cr_artbody"><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: So, what will happen to these?</font><br/><br/>These
licenses will need to be re-auctioned by the FCC. I'm guessing they
were over priced, the FCC will end up dropping the re-auction minimum
bid and they will end up going quickly.<br/></span><font color="#ff0000"><br/></font><span class="artText"><p class="ArticleBody"><font color="#ff0000">Mike: What's going to happen with D-Block?</font></p>
<p class="ArticleBody"><span class="cr_artbody">The
Public Safety D-Block did not meet the minimum bid and the FCC will
have to decide what to do. It looks like the FCC could go one of two
directions for the re-auction - drop the price or change the
requirements. </span>From the start, the public safety D-Block auction was seen as one of the biggest auction challenges...... I've <a href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2008/01/fcc-public-safety-spectrum-auction-new.html">expressed my opinion on the D-Block in the past</a>........ the FCC still has some major work ahead before they can close this one out.</p>
<p class="ArticleBody">This comes from <a id="mruh" href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/03/20/Verizon-Wireless-wins-large-chunk-700MHz-spectrum_1.html" title="InfoWorld">InfoWorld</a>:</p>
</span><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="artText"><p class="ArticleBody"><i>On Thursday, the
FCC voted to de-link the so-called D block from the rest of the auction
results. The D block was a 10MHz block that was to be paired with
another 10MHz controlled by public safety agencies, and the winning
bidder would have been required to build a nationwide voice and data
network to serve both public safety and commercial needs. But the FCC
failed to receive its $1.33 billion minimum bid for the D block, with
the lone $472 million bid coming from Qualcomm.</i></p>
</span><i>The FCC has no plans to immediately reauction the D block, a spokeswoman said. Instead, the agency &quot;will consider its options
                     for how to license this spectrum in the future,&quot; the FCC said in a news release.</i><span class="artText"><p class="ArticleBody">
                  </p>
</span></div><br/><font color="#ff0000">Mike: So, it looks like the big carriers won?</font><br/><br/>For the most part, yes. Kevin Martin had an interesting quote in an <a id="ocw." href="http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_The_Winners_of_Airwaves_Auction_Revealed_15438.html" title="EFluxMedia">EFluxMedia</a> piece though:<br/><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span id="intelliTXT" name="intelliTxt"><i>&quot;A bidder other than a
nationwide incumbent won a license in every market,&quot; FCC chairman Kevin
Martin said hinting that itâs possible for a &quot;wireless third-pipe&quot;
competitor to emerge in every market across the U.S. This would
increase the competition and the first one to benefit from it will be
the consumer.<br/></i></span></div><br/>Things still could get interesting!<br/>]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=320408#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/FCC_Auction_FINAL.mp3" length="16481889" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:17:10</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>FCC, 700 MHz, Spectrum, Auction, Spectrum Auction, Verizon, AT&#38;T, Public Safety, Wireless, Internet, Cellular</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>We review and discuss the final FCC 700 MHz auction results.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Next-Generation Internet: IPv6 Overview [33:00]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=318105#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<font color="#ff0000">Intro: The world has changed significantly since the Internet was first created. IPv6 gives over 4.3x10<sup>20 </sup>unique
addresses for every square inch on the planet, and is going to allow us
to do things we've only dreamed of in the past. In this podcast we give
an overview of IPv6.<br/>
<br/><br/>Mike: Gordon, before we get into the technology, can you give us an update on IPv6 history in the United States?<br/>
<br/>
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Sure Mike, this comes from a <a title="1-minute history of the Internet" href="http://www.fcw.com/print/22_3/features/151480-1.html" id="kg.p">1-minute history of the Internet</a> by Federal Computer week at <a href="http://www.fcw.com/" id="rs.1" title="FCW.COM">FCW.COM</a> </span><font color="#000000"><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Mike: So, </span></font></font><font color="#ff0000">the federal government has ordered its agencies to become IPv6- capable by June of 2008 and</font> <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">this is going to happen in June on our federal government networks - how about businesses?<br/>
</span></font></font>
<p>
  It's&nbsp; happening with business too Mike.&nbsp; Let's take Verizon as an example as quoted in a L<a href="http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=134665" id="zq3n" title="ight Reading post from last September">ight Reading post from last September</a>.<br/>
  
</p>



<p>
  <i>Verizon Business, which began its first phase of deploying
IPv6 on the public IP network in 2004, will complete the North America
region in 2008 and move into the Asia-Pacific and European regions from
late 2008 to 2009. The company will operate both IPv6 and IPv4, in what
is known as a &quot;dual stack&quot; arrangement, on its multi protocol label
switching (MPLS) network core. The company also has deployed IPv6
throughout its network access points (peering facilities) where
Internet service providers exchange traffic.</i>
</p>



<font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: So, what's the problem with IPv4?<br/>
<br/>
<font color="#000000">It's a combination of a lot of things - <a title="Microsoft has a nice set of resources" href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/ipv6faq.mspx" id="brm9">Microsoft has a nice set of resources</a> on IPv4 and IPv6 - let's use that as a guide:<br/>
<br/>
</font><font color="#000000"><i>The current version of IP (known as
Version 4 or IPv4) has not been substantially changed since RFC 791 was
published in 1981. IPv4 has proven to be robust, easily implemented and
interoperable, and has stood the test of scaling an internetwork to a
global utility the size of todayâs Internet. This is a tribute to its
initial design.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
<i>However, the initial design did not anticipate the following:</i><br/>
<br/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">
  <i>The recent exponential growth of the Internet and the impending exhaustion of the IPv4 address space.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>IPv4
addresses have become relatively scarce, forcing some organizations to
use a Network Address Translator (NAT) to map multiple private
addresses to a single public IP address. While NATs promote reuse of
the private address space, they do not support standards-based network
layer security or the correct mapping of all higher layer protocols and
can create problems when connecting two organizations that use the
private address space.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>Additionally,
the rising prominence of Internet-connected devices and appliances
ensures that the public IPv4 address space will eventually be depleted.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>The growth of the Internet and the ability of Internet backbone routers to maintain large routing tables.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>Because
of the way that IPv4 network IDs have been and are currently allocated,
there are routinely over 85,000 routes in the routing tables of
Internet backbone routers. The current IPv4 Internet routing
infrastructure is a combination of both flat and hierarchical routing.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>The need for simpler configuration.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>Most
current IPv4 implementations must be either manually configured or use
a stateful address configuration protocol such as Dynamic Host
Configuration Protocol (DHCP). With more computers and devices using
IP, there is a need for a simpler and more automatic configuration of
addresses and other configuration settings that do not rely on the
administration of a DHCP infrastructure.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>The requirement for security at the IP level.</i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>Private
communication over a public medium like the Internet requires
encryption services that protect the data being sent from being viewed
or modified in transit. Although a standard now exists for providing
security for IPv4 packets (known as Internet Protocol security or
IPSec), this standard is optional and proprietary solutions are
prevalent. </i><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <br style="font-style: italic;"/>
  <i>The need for better support for real-time delivery of dataâalso called quality of service (QoS).</i><br/>
</div>
<br/>
<i>While standards for QoS exist for IPv4, real-time traffic support
relies on the IPv4 Type of Service (TOS) field and the identification
of the payload, typically using a UDP or TCP port. Unfortunately, the
IPv4 TOS field has limited functionality and over time there were
various local interpretations. In addition, payload identification
using a TCP and UDP port is not possible when the IPv4 packet payload
is encrypted.</i><font color="#ff0000"><br style="font-style: italic;"/>
<font color="#000000"><i>To address these and other concerns, the
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has developed a suite of
protocols and standards known as IP version 6 (IPv6). This new version,
previously called IP-The Next Generation (IPng), incorporates the
concepts of many proposed methods for updating the IPv4 protocol. The
design of IPv6 is intentionally targeted for minimal impact on upper
and lower layer protocols by avoiding the random addition of new
features.<br/><br/></i></font>
<br/>
Mike: OK - can you list the primary features of IPv6? What makes it different?<br/>
<br/>
<font color="#000000">Sure Mike - this list also comes from <a title="Microsoft's website" href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/ipv6faq.mspx" id="ew3r">Microsoft's website</a>. The following are the features of the IPv6 protocol:<br/>
</font></font>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">
  <ol style="font-style: italic;"><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">New header format</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Large address space</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Efficient and hierarchical addressing and routing infrastructure</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Stateless and stateful address configuration</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Built-in security</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Better support for QoS</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">New protocol for neighboring node interaction</font></font>
    </li><li>
      <font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Extensibility</font></font>
    </li></ol>


  <br style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"/>
</div>
<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">Mike: Let's go through the list
with a brief summary of each. Your first item on the list was the new
header format. What's different?</span><br/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">
</div>
<font color="#ff0000"><br type="_moz"/><br/>Mike: How about number 2, large address space?<br/></font><font color="#ff0000"><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br/></span></font><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: Number 3 was efficient and hierarchical addressing and routing infrastructure - can you describe?</font></font></font><br/><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/><font color="#ff0000">Mike: How about number 4, stateless and stateful address configuration</font>?</font><br/><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><br/><br/>Mike: Number 5 was built-in security</font></font>.</font><br/><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: How about number 6, b</font><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#ff0000">etter support for QoS</font>?</font><br/><br/>
      <font color="#ff0000"><br/><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000">Mike: And number 7,</font> <font color="#ff0000">new protocol for neighboring node interaction</font></font>?</font><br/>
      
    <br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: And finally, number 8,&nbsp; e<font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000">xtensibility.</font><br/><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: Are there any other things you want to add to the list?<br/></font></font></font><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><br/><br/>Mike: Are we ready?<br/><br/><font color="#000000">I
always look at the end devices (even though there is so much more) and,
if we just look at desktops, you have to look at Microsoft.<br/><br/>Microsoft started with the following implementations of IPv6, all subsequent versions/products continue to support IPv6:<br/></font></font></font></font><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">The IPv6 protocol for the Windows Server 2003 and later families.</font></font></font></font><br/><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">The IPv6 protocol for Windows XP (Service Pack 1 [SP1] and later).</font></font></font></font><br/><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">The IPv6 protocol for Windows CE .NET version 4.1 and later</font></font></font></font><br/></div><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000"><br/>The
capture and parsing of IPv6 traffic is supported by Microsoft Network
Monitor, supplied with Microsoft Server 2003 and later products. <br/></font><br/><br/>Mike: This is a good overview - next week we'll get into some details on the IPv6 protocol!</font></font></font>]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=318105#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/IPv6_Overview_Final.mp3" length="31681811" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:33:00</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>IPv6, Internet Protocol, IPv4, Communications, Internet, Networks, Security, Quality of Service, Next-Generation Internet</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>In this podcast we give an overview of the Next-Generation Internet: IPv6</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>The iPhone Software Development Kit [48:00]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=315665#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<font color="#ff0000"><b>Intro: </b></font>On
Thursday, March 6, 2008, Apple released the iPhone Software Development
Kit (SDK) beta along with the App Stores, a place where iPhone users
will be able to get applications written for the iPhone. Apple also launched the Enterprise Beta Program.
	<p>
	<b><font color="#ff0000">Gordon: Mike, can you give us a quick rundown on what Apple released on Thursday?</font><br/><br/></b>
	</p>

	<p>Sure, much of our discussion today is based on an excellent post at macworld.com titled<font size="2"> <a id="c3jd" href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132424/2008/03/iphone_software_faq.html" title="The iPhone Software FAQ">The iPhone Software FAQ</a>. </font>Macworld editors Jason Snell, Jonathan Seff, Dan
Moren, Christopher Breen, and Rob Griffiths contributed to this
article. They also thank Glenn Fleishman, Craig Hockenberry, and Daniel
Jalkut for their feedback and contributions.</p>
<p>Here's how Macworld answered the question:<br/></p>
<p><i>The SDK is a set of tools that lets independent
programmers and software companies design, write, and test software
that runs on the iPhone. Right now there's a beta version for
developers, but a final version of the iPhone software that supports
the installation of new programs written by independent programmers is
due in late June.</i></p>

	<p><i>As a part of the announcement, Apple introduced a new iPhone program, </i><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132402/2008/03/appstore.html"><i>App Store</i></a><i>,
through which you'll be able to purchase, download, and update iPhone
software. That will be available as part of the new iPhone Software 2.0
update in late June. That's when you'll be able to add third-party apps
to your iPhone for the first time, at least via official channels.</i></p>

	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b>Gordon: You blogged about you experience with the SDK - can you tell us your first experience?</b></font></p>
I downloaded the new iPhone SDK and wrote about my first
impressions. I did quite a bit of FORTRAN programming many years ago
&gt; 10, but haven't done a whole lot lately. The SDK took a long time
to download -2 Gig - over my wireless connection. And about 45 minutes
to install. I also downloaded a couple of the sample applications Apple
provides ~ 1 Meg each. In about 15 minutes - would have been shorter if
I knew what I was doing - I was able to open the sample, compile and
run on the simulator Apple provides. <br/>I have
no doubt that this is going to have a huge impact on mobile application
development. It's really easy and really cool. If you teach programming
- I suggest you download the SDK today, install it in your labs, and
have your kids developing and running native iPhone apps by Monday
afternoon. Get the SDK <a href="http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/">here</a>. Even better, download <a href="http://www.jingproject.com/">Jing</a>
have your students record the simulator running their iPhone apps and
embed in your department or faculty webpage - great for marketing! Wish
I was 20 again!<br/><br/><font color="#ff0000"><b>Gordon: And you actually wrote a little Kalimba (African Thumb Piano) app. Where can we have a look?</b></font><br/><br/>You can go to my blog at <a id="hzhs" href="http://q-ontech.blogspot.com/2008/03/iphone-sdk.html" title="http://q-ontech.blogspot.com/2008/03/iphone-sdk.html">http://q-ontech.blogspot.com/2008/03/iphone-sdk.html</a> <br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/><b>Gordon: </b><b>Apple</b><b> is taking 30% of what is sold from the App Store - will shareware apps be available or will we have to pay for everything?</b></font><p>That's a good question and one that was sort of answered in the macworld.com post. <i>Macworld assumes Apple wonât let you sell a âfreeâ? program that
requires an unlock code. However, there are some other scenarios we
expect to see. First, donationware: People will probably sell âfreeâ?
programs that request that you make a donation if you want to keep the
project going. We donât think Apple will have any problem with that,
since the donation would be voluntary. Second, itâs possible that
youâll see two versions of various iPhone programs: a free âliteâ?
version thatâs a good advertisement for a more feature-rich for-pay
version.</i></p>

	<p><i>Macworld also mentions&nbsp; Iconfactoryâs
Twitterrific, a Mac program that is free, but contains ads. For an
âupgradeâ? fee, users can shut off the ads. Whether Apple would allow
this to be handled within the program or there would need to be two
separate versions of an iPhone version of Twitterrific remains to be
seen.</i></p>
<b><font color="#ff0000">Gordon: On Thursday, five companies demo'ed applications - can you give us a brief summary of what was shown?</font><br/><br style="font-style: italic;"/></b><i>From Macworld: Five companies </i><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132401/2008/03/aim.html"><i>showed off what they were able to put together</i></a><i>
with two weeks of engineering work and very few people involved. There
were games from Electronic Arts (Spore) and Sega (Super Money Ball), an
AIM client from AOL, medical software from Epocrates, and business
software from Salesforce.com. The programs took advantage of the
iPhoneâs built-in accelerometer, Multi-Touch capabilities, interface
elements, and more. </i><br type="_moz"/>
	<p>
	<b><font color="#ff0000">Gordon: I'm going to go back to the Macworld post again and take some questions directly from that FAQ:</font><br/></b></p>
<p><font color="#ff0000"><b><i>1. What kind of stuff does Apple say it wonât allow developers to create?</i></b></font>
	</p>
<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>2. What if someone writes a malicious program?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	
	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>3. Whatâs a âbandwidth hog?â?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	
	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>4. Can I buy these programs on my Mac, or just on the iPhone?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>5. What about software updates?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>6. What if youâve
synced your phone on one computer and then restore it on another? Do
you lose your apps until you sync to the original?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	
	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>7. If I buy a program for my iPhone, can I also transfer it to my significant otherâs iPhone?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	
	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i> 8. Can I download programs off the Web, or any place other than the App Store and iTunes?</i></b></font>
	</p>

<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>9. What about internal, âprivateâ? software? What about beta testing?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	<p>
	<font color="#ff0000"><b><i>10. Can I try the iPhone SDK and how could it be used in the classroom?</i></b></font>
	</p>

	<p><font color="#ff0000"><b>&nbsp;Gordon: Apple posted a roadmap video - can you tell us a little bit about that?</b></font></p>
<p>On March 6, Apple CEO Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone software roadmap,
released the iPhone Software Development Kit, and introduced the iPhone
Enterprise Beta Program. You can watch the presentation now and see what's
ahead at <a id="puby" href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/iphoneroadmap" title="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/iphoneroadmap">http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/iphoneroadmap</a> </p>
]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=315665#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/iPhone_SDK_FINAL.mp3" length="46081758" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:48:00</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>iPhone, Apple, Mobile, Open Source, Software Development, Programming, Telecommunications, ICT, Information Technology</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>On Thursday, March 6, 2008, Apple released the iPhone SDK) beta along with the App Stores and the Enterprise Beta Program.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>FCC 700 MHz Spectrum Auction Update: D-Block [19:10]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=310704#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><font color="#ff0000"><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Intro: In
this podcast we continue discussion on the in-progress FCC 700 MHz
spectrum auction, with a focus on the D-Block public safety piece.</span><br/></font></p>
<p><font color="#990000"><span class="cr_artbody">Mike: Gordon, can you give us a little background on the auction?</span></font></p>
<p>Back in 2005 Congress passed a law that requires all U.S. TV
stations to convert to all digital broadcasts and give up analog
spectrum in the 700 MHz frequency band. This law will free up 62 MHz of
spectrum in the 700 MHz band and effectively eliminate channels between
52 and 69. This <a id="bpmt" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2007/09/analog-to-digital-mandated-conversion.html" title="conversion">conversion</a>, which has a deadline of February 18, 2009, has freed up spectrum that is being split up by the FCC into five blocks:</p>
<ul><li>A-Block - 12 MHz, split up into 176 smaller economic areas<br/></li><li>B-Block - 12 MHz,  split up into 734 cellular market areas<br/></li><li>C-Block - 22 MHz, up into 12 regional licenses<br/></li><li>D-Block - 10MHz, combined with approximately 10MHz allocated for public safety, a single national license.<br/></li><li>E-Block - 6 MHz, split up into 176 smaller economic areas</li></ul>
Each Block has a reserve price set by FCC and if a reserve price is
not met in the auction, the FCC will end up re-auctioning that piece of
spectrum.<p><font color="#990000"><span class="cr_artbody">Mike:
I know we discussed the auction a few weeks ago and not much has
changed. Can you give us an update on where the auction is today?</span></font></p>
<p><span class="cr_artbody">Bidding round 102 came to a close yesterday afternoon with </span>$19,524,595,900 (last week the auction finished at $19,450,389,100 - it is slowing) <span class="cr_artbody">in </span><span class="cr_artbody">total
provisionally winning bids. Things have slowed considerably with only
40 new bids placed in round 102. For reference, on Thursday, each round
averaged about 50 new bids.<br/><br/>Most active in the final round
yesterday were E-Block licenses in the Bismark, North Dakota and Rapid
City, South Dakota areas along with B-Block licenses in the
southeastern United States.<br/><br/></span><span class="cr_artbody">The public safety D-Block still has not had a bid since the first round</span><span class="cr_artbody"> and will end up being re-auctioned by the FCC.<br/><br/>This
may end up being the last week (an FCC decision but I'm thinking so).
After the auction is closed the FCC will announce the winners.</span></p>
<p><font color="#990000"><span class="cr_artbody">Mike: Let's talk specifically about D-Block, the public safety piece. What's happened - why are we not seeing any new bids?</span></font></p>
<p><span class="cr_artbody">I think you have to go back and look at the history of D-Block. </span>Early on it appeared <a id="jgc6" href="http://www.frontlinewireless.com/" title="Frontline Wireless">Frontline Wireless</a>
would be one of the biggest bidders for D-Block spectrum - the company
was setup for D-Block and had worked closely with the FCC on putting
together specifications for the spectrum. Frontline built a <a id="vh8-" href="http://www.frontlinewireless.com/team.php" title="formidable team">formidable team</a> including Vice Chairman <a id="kv43" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Hundt" title="Reed Hundt">Reed Hundt</a><b>, </b>who
served as Chairman of the FCC between 1993 and 1997. The business plan,
the organization, the technology seemed to all be in place........ On
January 12 the company placed the following statement on their website:
 </p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Frontline Wireless is closed for business at this time.  We have no further comment.</i></p>
<p>Another company, <a id="xoza" href="http://www.cyrencall.com/" title="Cyren Call">Cyren Call</a> also looked like they were planning to bid on the D-Block Auction but did not.</p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Mike: So what
happened? </span><br/></p>
<p>Rumor has it Frontline could not attract enough funders - it
seemed like a good investment - or at least you may think so up front.
Many are now asking if the FCC's approach to solving the public safety
inter-operability problem is in trouble. At the same time many are also
asking &quot;Is there a better way?&quot;</p>
<p>I've always liked the idea of public-private partnerships and we've seen them work in times of disaster - last August I wrote <a id="tn4g" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2007/08/muni-wifi-one-year-and-minneaplis.html" title="here">here</a> about <span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 85%;"><span style="font-size: 100%;"><span style="font-size: 130%;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 100%;">the Minneapolis I-35 bridge collapse tragedy and how within minutes</span> </span></span></span><a id="nitg" href="http://www.usiwireless.com/" title="USI Wireless">USI Wireless</a>
opened their subscription-based Wi-Fi service so anyone could use it
for free. US Wireless didn't just stop there - because the network had
only been built around part of the disaster, the company installed
additional Wi-Fi radios in areas surrounding the catastrophe to blanket
it with signals, providing an additional 12 megabits per second of
capacity to the area around the bridge collapse.</p>
<p>A national network built from scratch may be too big of a bite though. <br/></p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Mike: So what are we looking at for a solution?</span><br/></p>
<p>Last month I had an interesting conversation with <a id="oleq" href="http://rivada.com/" title="Rivada Networksâ">Rivada Networksâ</a> Senior Vice President for External Affairs John Kneuer about emergency responder
communications and the FCC Spectrum Auction.. Rivada uses existing cellular networks and commercial off-the-shelf technology to <i>deliver high-speed voice and data services over a network that can survive natural or man-made disasters</i>.
I like the idea of using the existing commercial infrastructure for
public safety for lots of reasons. <br/></p>
<p> State homeland
security officials have struggled for years with the inability of local
emergency responders to communicate with each other and their federal
counterparts during disasters. This inter-operability problem is so
serious it has been identified as the number one concern of state
homeland security officials in the <a id="kzuv" href="http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.9123e83a1f6786440ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=36c8c1e0edde6110VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD" title="National Governors Association 2007 State Homeland Security Directors Survey">National Governors Association 2007 State Homeland Security Directors Survey</a>. Here's a quote from the report:<br/></p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Public
safety interoperable communications once again topped the list of
homeland security advisorsâ concerns in 2007 as states continue to work
to ensure that first responders from various agencies, jurisdictions,
and levels of government can speak to each other during emergencies or
at the scene of a disaster. Increasingly, the campaign for
interoperability has expanded beyond voice communications to encompass
data and video interoperability as well. </i><br/></div><br/><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Mike: How does this system work?</span><br/><br/>Rivada uses existing cellular networks and commercial off-the-shelf technology to <i>deliver high-speed voice and data services over a network that can survive natural or man-made disasters</i>.
Right now Rivada is working with National Guard units in 11 states
(Alabama, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, and Washington).
These units are installing new communications systems for voice and
data services over a network that uses existing commercial
infrastructure. Not relying on a single network makes a lot of sense
when you consider communications survival during natural or man-made
disasters.<br/><br/>According to a Rivada press release, the Louisiana
Army National Guard decided last year to adopt their interoperable
public safety communications system for the following reasons:<br/><ul><li><i>Is available today,</i></li><li><i>Does not require new spectrum allocation or depend on federal spectrum auctions or mandates, and</i></li><li><i>Offers far greater range and capability at a fraction of the cost of other existing or planned technologies.</i></li></ul>
Rivada also supplements existing technology and infrastructure as needed by:<br/><ul><li><i>Building new towers in areas without sufficient commercial infrastructure;</i></li><li><i>Employing
Rivada Interoperable Communications Extension Systems (ICES) â âfly-inâ?
units capable of being deployed within hours â where existing
infrastructure has been degraded or destroyed;</i></li><li><i>Using
proprietary backwards-compatible technology to provide full
interoperability between cell phones, PDAs, laptops, landlines and
traditional âwalkie talkieâ-type Land Mobile Radio (LMR) systems; and</i></li><li><i>Combining all of these elements into an efficient network architecture.</i></li></ul>
<span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Mike: Who would these leasing agreements be with?</span><br/><br/>Right
now Rivada is not saying who they are making leasing agreements with
but it seems like a safe bet to assume Verizon, Sprint and AT&amp;T
will be involved - it would be good revenue along with PR and
advertising for the companies. In terms of the public safety personnel
it makes a whole lot of sense because they would be able to use their
day-to-day wireless devices in emergency situations.<br/><br/>The providers would build out, maintain and update the infrastructure....... I'm liking this kind  of solution.]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=310704#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/D_Block_Auction_FINAL.mp3" length="18401994" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:19:10</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>FCC, Spectrum Auction, Public Safety, Communications, Telecommunications, Emergency Responders, First Responders</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>We continue discussion on the in-progress FCC 700 MHz spectrum auction, with a focus on the D-Block public safety piece.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>The FCC 700 MHz Spectrum Auction [28:48]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=303271#</link>
<description><![CDATA[The FCC 700 MHz Spectrum Auction<br/><br/><font color="#ff0000">Intro: In this podcast we discuss the in-progress FCC 700 MHz spectrum auction.<br/><br/>Gordon:
Mike, you are the reigning Global Wireless Education Consortium
Educator of the year so you know about this stuff - what exactly is
this spectrum the FCC is auctioning and where did it come from?<br/><br/></font>Back in 2005 Congress passed a law that requires all U.S. TV
stations to convert to all digital broadcasts and give up analog
spectrum in the 700 MHz frequency band. This law will free up 62 MHz of
spectrum in the 700 MHz band and effectively eliminate channels between
52 and 69. This <a title="conversion" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2007/09/analog-to-digital-mandated-conversion.html" id="bpmt">conversion</a>, which has a deadline of February 18, 2009, has freed up spectrum that is being split up by the FCC into five blocks.<br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/></font><font color="#ff0000">Gordon: What so interesting about this block of spectrum?<br/><br/><font color="#000000">Cell coverage, required cell-site density and cost (total network cost and cost per customer).</font><br/></font><br/><font color="#ff0000">I understand each
spectrum block in the 700 MHz auction, except for the national public
safely D-Block, has been assigned an area designation by the FCC. Could you
describe those areas included in the 700 MHz auction using <a title="FCC definitions" href="http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/areas/" id="m8.7">FCC definitions</a>.</font><br/><br/><b>Economic Areas</b><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;">Both
the A-Block (12 MHz) and the E-Block (6 MHz) are being auctioned using
the Economic Area (BEA) service areas established by the Regional
Economic Analysis Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S.
Department of Commerce. Included are Guam and the Northern Mariana
Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa and
the Gulf of Mexico. There are a total of 176 Economic Area service
areas designated by the FCC.<br/><br/>BEA services include General
Wireless Communications Service (GWCS), Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)
and Location and Monitoring Service (LMS). </div><br/><b>Cellular Market Areas</b><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;">The
B-Block (12 MHz) is being auctioned using the Cellular Market Area
(CMA) service areas. The 734 CMAs are broken down as follows:<br/><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;">
Areas 1-305: Created from the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)
defined by the Office of Management and Budget (1-305)<br/></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><div style="margin-left: 40px;">        Area 306:     The Gulf of Mexico<br/>Areas
307-734: Rural Service Areas (RSAs) established by the FCC which do not
cross state borders including parts of Puerto Rico not already in an
MSA (723-729), U.S. Virgin Islands <br/>                   (730-731), Guam (732), American Samoa (733), and Northern Mariana Islands          (734).<br/></div></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br/>CMA Services include Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Interactive Video and Data Service (IVDS) </div><p><b>Regional Economic Areas</b></p>

<p style="margin-left: 40px;">The
C-Block (22 MHz) is being auctioned using the 12 Regional Economic
Areas (REAs) created by the FCC. The REAs are an aggregation of the 52
Major Economic Areas (MEAs) defined by the FCC.</p>

          REA Services include Wireless Communications Service (WCS)<p>All FCC areas, along with names, county lists, maps and map info data can be found on the Commission's website linked <a title="here" href="http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/maps/areas/" id="qsl9">here.</a>              </p>

<font color="#ff0000">Mike: How is the auction being conducted?</font><br/>


<div style="float: right; margin-right: 10px;">


</div>
<p>On their website, the <a title="Federal Communications Commission" href="http://www.fcc.gov/" id="y3-w">Federal Communications Commission</a> has&nbsp; a public notice titled <a title="Auction of 700 MHZ Band Licenses" href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-83A1.pdf" id="e_.r">Auction of 700 MHZ Band Licenses</a>. This document describes the bidding procedure for the <a title="214 companies" href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-83A2.pdf" id="gaap">214 companies</a> that have qualified for the auction, which will be handled by the <a href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/">Wireless Telecommunications Bureau</a>
(WTB). The WTB is one of seven FCC Bureaus and is responsible for all
FCC domestic wireless telecommunications programs and policies.<br/><br/>Here's a summary outline of the procedure pulled from the 12 page FCC document:<br/></p>

<ul><li><i>Bidding in Auction 73 started on Thursday, January 24, 2008.</i></li><li><i>Each qualified bidder received prior to January 24:</i><br/><ul><li><i> At least two RSA SecurID tokens </i></li><li><i> An Integrated Spectrum Auction System (ISAS) Bidderâs Guide </i></li><li><i> A FCC Auction Bidder Line phone number</i></li></ul>

</li><li><p><i>The
FCC will conduct the auction over the Internet and telephonic bidding
will also be available. In either case, each authorized bidder must
have his or her own SecurID token.</i></p>

</li><li><i>There will be a
minimum opening bid amount for each license and package and the minimum
opening bid amount is subject to reduction at the discretion of the </i><i>WTB</i><i>. The </i><i>WTB</i><i> will not entertain requests to lower minimum opening bid amounts.<br/></i></li><li> <p><i>The </i><i>WTB</i><i> has established the following block-specific aggregate reserve prices for Auction 73:</i><br/></p>

<ul><li><i>Block A, $1.807380 billion;<br/></i></li><li><i>Block B, $1.374426 billion;<br/></i></li><li><i>Block C, $4.637854 billion;<br/></i></li><li><i>Block D, $1.330000 billion;<br/></i></li><li><i>Block E, $0.903690 billion.</i><br/></li></ul>

</li></ul>

<font color="#ff0000">Mike:
It's interesting the range of reserve prices - is it safe to say that
these correlate to the &quot;value&quot; the FCC sees with each?<br/></font><ul><li><p><i>If, at the close of bidding in Auction 73, the aggregate reserve price for the A, B, C  and/or E Blocks has not been met, the </i><i>WTB</i><i> will issue an announcement that bidding in Auction 73 is closed and set a date for commencement of Auction 76.</i></p>

</li><li><p><i>Round
results will be available approximately 10 minutes after the close of
each round. and two types of reports will be available to bidders: (a)
publicly available information, and (b) bidder-specific information
available only to that bidder when logged in to the FCC Auction System.</i></p>

</li><li><p><i>Each
qualified bidder will have a default watchlist that contains every
license and packages of licenses selected on the bidderâs short-form
application. Qualified bidders may also create custom watchlists.</i></p>

</li><li><p><i>On Tuesday, January 22, the </i><i>WTB</i><i> conducted a mock auction, which will allow qualified bidders to
familiarize themselves with the FCC Auction System. Only qualified
bidders will be permitted to participate in the mock auction.<br/></i></p>

</li><li><i>Once
winning bids are announced (either after Auction 73 or Auction 76) and
winning bidders are announced, winning bidders will have 10 business
days to file a long-form application (FCC Form 601) and make down
payments for all of the licenses it won.</i></li></ul>

<font color="#ff0000">Mike: Who are some of the major bidders?<br/></font><br/> <span class="inside-head"><a title="USA Today" href="http://www.usatoday.com/" id="e:lr">USA Today</a> has published an interesting article titled <a title="Google could cause a stir in FCC's airwaves auction" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/2008-01-23-fcc-auction_N.htm" id="h525">Google could cause a stir in FCC's airwaves auction</a> and, in the article, some of the leading bidders and their likely strategies are listed.<br/><br/>Let's take a quick look at some of the major bidders (in alphabetical order) and their expected bidding strategies. </span><span class="inside-head">For additional detail be sure to read the  <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/2008-01-23-fcc-auction_N.htm">USA Today Article</a>.</span><span class="inside-head"><br/></span><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span class="inside-head"><a title="AT&T" href="http://www.att.com/" id="m6ly"><b><i>AT&amp;T</i></b></a> </span><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>AT&amp;T
already has more spectrum than any other carrier so bidding on the 700
MHz band will be used for further build-out. Many experts are
speculating AT&amp;T will focus primarily on the D-Block public-safety
spectrum.<br/></i></div><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: Why is AT&amp;T going after public-safety spectrum? Am I missing something?</font><br/><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Cablevision" href="http://www.cablevision.com/" id="fymn"><b><i>Cablevision</i></b></a><b><i>, </i></b><a title="Cox" href="http://www.cox.com/" id="e.6."><b><i>Cox</i></b></a><b><i>, </i></b><a title="Advance/Newhouse" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_Publications#Cable_television" id="vb:t"><b><i>Advance/Newhouse</i></b></a><b><i>, </i></b><a title="Bresnan" href="http://www.bresnan.com/" id="j0_3"><b><i>Bresnan</i></b></a><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>These
cable companies are interested in spectrum to provide wireless services
and compete with the large providers. Most experts believe they will be
bidding on A-Block regional licenses in their service areas.<br/></i></div></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="EchoStar" href="http://www.echostar.com/" id="a.ul"><b><i>EchoStar</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>EchoStar
is a satellite TV provider that is interested in using spectrum to
provide wireless broadband access to its customers. Most experts do not
feel EchoStar has the money to compete with companies like Google,
At&amp;T and Verizon in the auction.<br/></i></div><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com/" id="lcop"><b><i>Google</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>Google
is the heavyweight here. The company wants to further expand into the
cellular smartphone market and has the money to compete with the big
providers. The company is expected to bid the $4.6 Billion minimum for
the C-Block spectrum.<br/></i></div><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: Is this National Spectrum? As opposed to regional?</font><br/><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Leap" href="http://www.leapwireless.com/" id="wefe"><b><i>Leap</i></b></a><b><i>, </i></b><a title="MetroPCS" href="http://www.metropcs.com/" id="zn-j"><b><i>MetroPCS</i></b></a><b><i>,, </i></b><a title="Alltel" href="http://www.alltel.com/" id="xj8j"><b><i>Alltel</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>Like
the cable companies (Cablevision, Cox, etc), these regional wireless
companies will likely be bidding on A-Block regional licenses in their
service areas. Experts also are speculating Alltel will bid on the
public safety D-Block spectrum.<br/></i></div><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Vulcan" href="http://www.vulcan.com/" id="n:df"><b><i>Paul Allen and Vulcan</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>Paul
Allen's (co-founder of Microsoft with Bill Gates) investment company,
Vulcan, already owns spectrum in Washington and Oregon.Vulcan may be
bidding on some of the C-Block regional licenses or smaller A or
B-Block regional licenses.<br/></i></div><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Qualcomm" href="http://www.qualcomm.com/" id="n-by"><b><i>Qualcomm</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>The
California based wireless manufacturer is looking for spectrum for its
MediaFlo smartphone video service. Qualcomm will likely be bidding on
E-Block regional licenses.<br/></i></div><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a title="Verizon" href="http://www.verizon.com/" id="z750"><b><i>Verizon</i></b></a><br/></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><i>Verizon will likely be bidding big on C-Block spectrum with plans to open their network to any (hardware and software) devices.</i><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/></font></div><font color="#ff0000">Mike: Can you give us some background on the auction to date?</font><br/><p>The 26th round finished yesterday (Friday - Feb. 1, 2008) afternoon - here's a quick update from the <a title="FCC auction site" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=73" id="m:u8">FCC auction site</a>:<br/></p>

<ul><li>Bidding Rounds to Date: 26<br/></li><li>Bid totals to Date: <span class="cr_artbody">$18,554,080,600</span><br/></li><li>The A and B-Blocks have been getting most of the attention lately:</li><ul><li><span class="cr_artbody">The Los Angeles A-Block leads the A's  </span>with a current bid<span class="cr_artbody"> of</span> <span class="cr_artbody">$580,268,000.</span></li><li>The Chicago B-Block leads the B's with a current bid<span class="cr_artbody"> of </span><span class="cr_artbody">$892,400,000</span><span class="cr_artbody">.</span></li></ul>

<li><span class="cr_artbody">There has not been a C-Block bid since it <a title="passed the FCC reserve price on Thursday" href="http://ictcenter.blogspot.com/2008/01/google-becomes-telephone-company.html" id="xkb4">passed the FCC reserve price on Thursday</a>. The current C-Block bid is </span>$4,713,823,000.</li><li><span class="cr_artbody">The public safety D-Block has not had a bid in 25 </span><span class="cr_artbody">consecutive rounds and is stuck at </span>$472,042,000<span class="cr_artbody">, well below the $1.3 Billion reserve price set by the FCC.</span></li><li><span class="cr_artbody">E-Block bidding has been slow with the New York City E-Block leading at </span>      $178,897,000.</li><li><span class="cr_artbody">23 licenses had not registered a bid at the end of round 26, 19 of these 23 are in the E-Block.<br/></span></li></ul>

<span class="cr_artbody"><font color="#ff0000">Mike: Any personal observations and opinions on the auction?</font><br/></span><ul><li><span class="cr_artbody">It looks (to me anyways) like the C-Block bidding may be done. Since the FCC reserve price of $4.6 Billion has been passed, the </span><span class="cr_artbody">
open-access that Google wanted is assured. We won't know who the
winning bidders are until after the auctions have closed but I'd say
Google is the current leading C-Block bidder.<br/></span></li><li><span class="cr_artbody">Right
now it does not look like the D-Block will meet the $1.3 Billion
reserve price and will end up being re-auctioned by the FCC.</span></li><li><span class="cr_artbody">A number of E-Block licenses will not meet minimum bids and will also be re-auctioned.<br/></span></li><li><span class="cr_artbody">The
FCC had set an original goal of $10 Billion for the auction. With
current bids totaling over $18 Billion, it appears the auction (from
the FCC's perspective) will be a success.<br/></span></li></ul>

<span class="cr_artbody">Bidding is closed for the weekend with round 27 starting Monday (Feb. 4, 2008) morning.</span><br/><font color="#ff0000"><br/>Mike: What's the best way to stay updated?</font><br/><br/>If you want to stay updated - the <a title="FCC  Auction 73: 700 MHz Auction Summary page" href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=73" id="owcc">FCC  Auction 73: 700 MHz Auction Summary page</a> lists, among other things, results of the auction after each round. You can also watch my blog!<br/><br/><font color="#ff0000">Mike: When will we know the winners?</font><br/><br/>The
auction will likely last a couple of months so we won't know the
winners until then. We should start to see products from the winning
bidders that use the spectrum sometime next year.<br/><br/>

    
    
]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=303271#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/Auction_73.mp3" length="27656937" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:28:48</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>700 MHz, FCC, Federal Communications Commission, Spectrum Auction, Patriots, Giants, National Science Foundation, Technology</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>In this podcast we discuss the in-progress FCC 700 MHz spectrum auction.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>An Interview with Google Engineer Martin Trieu [31:32]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=298438#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: bold;">Special Notes: </span>In this podcast Mike and I interview Martin Trieu, a former community
college student and current Google Engineer from California. The interview was
done on January 5, 2008 during our National Science Foundation funded
National Center for Telecommunications Technologies (located at
Springfield Technical Community College) winter conference hosted by
Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, California. <br/>
<br/>
Weâd like to thank Dr Ann Beheler; Dean, Business, Computing, &amp;
Career Services at Orange Coast College and Principle Investigator of
the NSF funded Convergence Technology Center (located at Collin County
Community College), for hosting our conference and arranging this
interview with Martin. Weâd also like to thank the National Science
Foundation for funding and support. <br/>
<br/>
In the interview Martin uses a couple of acronyms that may need
clarification. He refers to UCI - short for University of California,
Irvine and EE â short for Electrical Engineering. He also refers to
Orange Coast College as âOCCâ?.<br/>
<br/>
Martinâs son, 14 year old Martin Jr, was in the audience and is taking a programming course at OCC this semester.<br/>
<br/>
Iâd also like to thank Mike Q â this was the first interview weâve done
in front of a live audience and I ended up asking all the questions due to some microphone issues.<br/>
<br/>
We know youâll find the interview with Martin fascinating â if you are
a potential student, Martinâs story could inspire you to take a look at
your local community college. If you are a current student â we hope
his story motivates you to continue to do your best work. If you are a
faculty or staff member â we know you can relate to Martinâs story
because you and your students have similar stories to tell. If you are
an employer â Martin is a good example of the type of talent,
dedication and motivation you will find coming out of your local
community college.<br/>
<br/>
We especially enjoyed recording and now enjoy listening to this interview with Martin â we hope you do too!<br/><br/>- Gordon<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<font color="#990000">Podcast Intro: Weâre here today at the NCTT
Winter Conference hosted by Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, CA.
with Martin Trieu, a Software Engineer at Google Audio.</font> <br/>
<br/>
Interview Questions:<br/>
<br/>
<font color="#990000">1.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Can you tell us about your background â where were you born and what brought you to the United States?<br/>
<br/>
2.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;I know you attended Orange Coast College, what made you decide to
go to college and why did you choose a community college?<br/>
<br/>
3.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;What happened after you graduated?<br/>
<br/>
4.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;How did you start working for Internet based companies?<br/>
<br/>
5.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;How has working for Internet based companies changed?<br/>
<br/>
6.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Can you describe your current job?<br/>
<br/>
7.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;What advice would you give young people with regards to careers and success?</font><br/>
<br/>


    
    
]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=298438#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/Martin_Interview_FINAL.mp3" length="30278008" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:31:32</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Google, Community College, Orange Coast College, National Science Foundation, Computers, Technology, Computer Science, Vietnam</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>An Interview with Martin Trieu, a Software Engineer at Google Audio.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>Online Collaboration: January 2008 [22:29]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=297751#</link>
<description><![CDATA[

    
    


    
    


    
    


    
    


    
    


    
    
Intro: <font size="3">In this podcast we discuss the growing array of online collaboration tools.<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike:
Gordon, because I'm in New Jersey and you're in Massachusetts, we've
had to rely on online collaboration tools quite a bit. What are some of
the tools we use most often?<br/></font><br/>Gordon: If we look just at
what we're doing today. We use Skype - the free VoIP client to record
these podcasts and we use Google Docs (docs.google.com) to write, edit
and share the scripts. In fact, I use Google Docs to collect material
and write my blog - ictcenter.blogspot.com<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: Although it's not a new tool, we also use email quite a bit.</font><br/><br/>Gordon:
Yes - email is still a very important tool, but more and more we seem
to be communicating with other tools such as Twitter and Text
Messaging. The iPhone really lends itself to quick communication with
email, Tweets, and IM.<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: Twitter and Google Docs aren't the only options.</font><br/><br/>Gordon:
No. in addition to twitter, there are micro-blogging services Jaiku and
Pownce, although if you compare the three using Google Trends, we see
that Twitter is by far the most popular of the three.<br/><div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="uih."><img src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddg2s8mp_745jnh3rj5q" style="width: 572px; height: 245px;"/></div><font color="#cc0000">Mike: What about Google Docs.</font><br/><br/>Gordon:
It's what we use, and probably the most popular, but there are
alternatives, including Zoho, Thinkfree and Zimbra. Again Google Trends
gives us a nice snapshot.<br/><br/><div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="efa5"><img src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddg2s8mp_746f58p43cw" style="width: 575px; height: 244px;"/></div>Gordon: There's been some movement with some of these tools.<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike:
Yes. Zimbra was purchased in September by Yahoo, and Thinkfree is
having some issues with leadership and possibly looking at a change of
direction.<br/><br/><font color="#000000">Gordon: Are there some new online collaboration tools?</font><br/><br/>Mike: Robin Good&nbsp;</font><a href="http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2007/12/24/online_collaboration_technologies_new.htm" class="AttributeUrl">Online Collaboration Technologies - New Tools And Web Services - Robin Good's Latest News</a> <font color="#cc0000">has
a great listing of some new online collaboration tools and services.
Good also points to Kolabora www.kolabora.com - a great resource for
news and information about online collaboration.<br/></font></font><br/><div><font size="3">Gordon: Mike could you give us an overview of the tools Good describes.<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: Sure - the article describes eight new online collaboration services, including:</font></font><font color="#cc0000"><br/></font>
  <p>
  </p>

    <font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>Tokbox:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://www.tokbox.com/">http://www.tokbox.com/</a></font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000">
is a free web-based video conferencing application that enable you to
have one-to-one video meetings online. With the service, you create a
video
room and invite someone for a video conference. You can even embed the
conference room on your web-site, or blog. I think this is a great tool
for providing technical support, office hours, access to a librarian,
or even college counseling.</font><br/></font><br/><font size="3">Gordon: What else?<br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike:&nbsp;</font></font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>SeeToo:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://www.seetoo.com/">http://www.seetoo.com/</a> </font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000">On
the surface, SeeToo a free web-based application for sharing videos
with friends and family doesn't seem that novel. What makes SeeToo
unique is that you don't need to upload your videos - instead you
select a video (any size) from your computer, invite others to watch,
and click play to start watching together. It's like you're running
your own streaming server! </font><br/></font><br/><ul><p>
    </p>
</ul>

      <font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>SnapYap:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://www.snapyap.com/">http://www.snapyap.com/</a></font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"> Similar to ToKBox a free one-to-one video conferencing room</font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000">.
Create a personal video
conference room, invite anyone to join - SnapYap users just enter their
username, others get an email with instructions to enter the room.</font><br/><br/></font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>TeamViewer:&nbsp;</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://www.teamviewer.com/">http://www.teamviewer.com/</a></font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"> TeamViewer is a free (<b><i>for personal, non-commercial use</i></b>) <b><i>Windows-only</i></b>
application
that allows you to share your screen and control someone else's PC.
After downloading, you start the program without any
installation. You have a code and password you can provide to others to
view and control your PC, and similarly, they have a code/password
combination they can share with you. Other features include chat and
the ability to transfer files. Possible applications include
helpdesk/desktop support, application demos, and distance education.</font><font size="3"><br/><br/></font>
      <font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>FlickIM:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://flick.im/">http://flick.im/</a> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000">FlickIM
is a free Web-based instant messenger application that allows you to
connect to all major IM services (AIM, MSN, Yahoo, GoogleTalk, Jabber,
ICQ). Seems very similar to an existing service - meebo. Includes
video, audio and other</font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000"> add-ons, as well as an iPhone friendly interface. Meebo has also customized their interface for the iPhone.</font><br/></font><br/><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>Loudtalks:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://loudtalks.com/">http://loudtalks.com/</a> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000">Is a free, <b><i>Windows-only</i></b> download-able application that gives users walkie talkie-like ability to communicate with one another </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000">with the touch of a single button(F7).</font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000"> Versions are being developed for other platforms, including mobile phones.</font><br/></font><font size="3"><b><br/><font color="#cc0000">AirTalkr:</font></b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://airtalkr.com/">http://airtalkr.com/</a> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000">Similar to FlickIM, AirTalkr allows you to access multiple IM networks. One major difference is access to Web 2.0 services </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000">(Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, and Myspace). </font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000">AirTalkr
is runs within Adobe's AIR (cross-operating system runtime; hybrid
web/desktop applications) - Windows and MAC, and also as a web-based
application. Looks like the download version doesn't work with the
current version of AIR. Here's a screen grab:</font><br/></font><div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="lq6c"><img src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddg2s8mp_747hg7ph6dh" style="width: 702px; height: 504px;"/></div><br/>
    <font size="3" color="#cc0000"><b>Global IP Video:</b> </font><font size="3" color="#cc0000"><a href="http://www.globalipvideo.com/">http://www.globalipvideo.com/</a><br/>Global IP Video has a f</font><font size="3"><font color="#cc0000">ree web-based (no downloads, no installs) video conferencing tool MeBeem (<a id="o456" href="http://www.mebeem.com/" title="http://www.mebeem.com">http://www.mebeem.com</a>)
that uses flash to create video conferences. In a browser, create a
room, share it, and click to connect. Not sure how well it works, and
seems a little like the wild west. Here are a couple screenshots:</font><br/><div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="ki2b"><img width="473" height="296" src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddg2s8mp_748cgdwrzdd"/><font size="3"><font size="3"><font size="3"><div style="padding: 1em 0pt; text-align: left;" id="sqp2"><img width="464" height="263" src="http://docs.google.com/File?id=ddg2s8mp_749dnvh47kx"/></div></font></font></font></div></font></div><font size="3"><br/><br/></font>
]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=297751#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/January_14_Podcast.mp3" length="21588871" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:22:29</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Collaboration, Web 2.0, webware, twitter, micro-blogging,video, online</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>In this podcast we discuss the growing array of online collaboration tools.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>Broadband the AT&#38;T and Qwest Way [26:40]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=289965#</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><font color="#cc0000">Mike Intro: December 19. 2007: Broadband the AT&amp;T and Qwest Way<br/>In this podcast we discuss AT&amp;T and Qwests Fiber to the Node projects.</font></p>
<p><font color="#cc0000"><br/></font></p>
<p><font color="#cc0000">Mike: Gordon, can you give us a little background on what AT&amp;T is doing?</font><br/><br/>Project
Lightspeed was announced as a 6 billion dollar project by AT&amp;T in
June 2004 and involves running optical fiber out to a remote terminal,
or node and providing the last portion of the connection over copper
wire. The project was ambitious from the start with initial plans to
reach close to 19 million homes by the end of 2008. AT&amp;T has given
the product the name <a id="aul2" href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=5838" title="U-verse">U-verse</a>
and at the TelcoTV conference last October, VP of converged services
at AT&amp;T Labs Research Peter Hill gave the keynote address featuring
the product. Here's a few quotes from an <a id="q1ri" href="http://www.cedmagazine.com/ATT-gears-up-for-new-U-verse-features.aspx" title="October 26 CED Magazine post">October 26 CED Magazine post</a>:<br/></p>
<div class="text" id="ctl00_ContentArea_cbArticleBody"><p style="margin-left: 40px;">A<i>T&amp;Tâs
roll out of its IPTV video services has been slower than it originally
anticipated, but with more than 126,000 current subscribers, the
company feels as though itâs on the right track. AT&amp;T started the
year with 3,000 video subscribers, then grew that base to 16,000 and
60,000, respectively, in the first and second quarters.</i></p>
  <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>âWeâre
past the point of last year where the question was, âWill IPTV
scale?â,â? said Peter Hill, VP of converged services at AT&amp;T Labs
Research, during the first keynote address Wednesday morning at
TelcoTV. âYou canât get to that number (126,000 subscribers) without
significant flow through and automation. We do have a competitive
service and we can do it to scale.â?</i></p>
<br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike:
There's always been concerns about bandwidth, especially when compated
to products like the Verizon Fiber to the Home, or FiOS project. How is
AT&amp;T doing with U-verse?</font><br/><br/>Bandwidth has been a major concern, with Hill commenting on the <a id="mggv" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264" title="H.264 compression standard">H.264 compression standard</a>:<br/><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>âThe encoding rates for </i><a id="z3te" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264" title="H.264"><i>H.264</i></a><i> have come down faster than we projected,â? Hill said. âWeâll be able to do more channels in the same amount of bandwidth.â?</i></div><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: What other services will be available?</font><br/><br/>Hill
says the company will be adding home DVRs that allow satellite set-top
boxes to show video downloaded to the DVR box. Hill also said the
company will be adding to the current 30 high-definition channels next
year along with photo-sharing and a Voice over IP (VoIP) service.
Here's more interesting quotes from the CED Magazine piece:<br/><p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>While
cable executives have said there is no compelling reason to move to an
IP infrastructure to deliver video services, Hill contends that IPTV is
âvery different from cable and satelliteâ? because the nature of IP
allows for easier integration among services while also allowing it to
take advantage of Internet partners such as </i><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/" title="Amazon"><i>Amazon</i></a><i>.......<br/></i></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>One
of those features is âCinema Centerâ? that allows movies to be purchased
from Amazon with one click. The movie portal content would be dynamic
and would allow subscribers to view trailers prior to making their
purchases.</i></p>
 <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>âWe donât have to create this stuff in IP because it reaches out to Web devices and incorporates them into IPTV,â? Hill said.</i></p>
   <p><br/></p>
<p>Hill
demonstrated how an iPhone could be used to remotely program a home TV
and how multiple cameras at live events could be selected by the
viewer. He also demonstrated a feature that used an i-Phone to remotely
configure channel favorites on a home TV. The application would give
four different i-Phone users the ability to program their favorite
shows on their household TVs. Also discussed was a Web cam feature that
would let viewers in different locations view a live performance of a
sporting event or dance concert based on IP technology that uses
switched digital video.<br/></p>
<p><font color="#cc0000"><br/></font></p>
<p><font color="#cc0000">Mike: I know they had problems with the original set top box - any updates?<br/></font></p>
<p>Also, according to CED Magazine:</p>
 <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>During the question-and-answer segment, Hill said AT&amp;T would continue to rely on the </i><a target="_blank" href="http://www.motorola.com/" title="Motorola"><i>Motorola</i></a><i> set-top box with the </i><a target="_blank" href="http://www.sigmadesign.com/" title="Sigma Designs"><i>Sigma Designs</i></a><i> processor as its main workhorse, although itâs also working with </i><a target="_blank" href="http://www.scientificatlanta.com/" title="Scientific Atlanta"><i>Scientific Atlanta</i></a><i> on a box with the same signature.</i></p>
 <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Hill expected new set-top boxes with second-generation chipsets from Sigma and </i><a target="_blank" href="http://www.broadcom.com/" title="Broadcom"><i>Broadcom</i></a><i> to be available in 2009.</i></p>
 </div><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: How is it selling?</font><br/><br/>The <a id="q24w" href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=5838" title="U-verse product website">U-verse product website</a> lists:<br/><br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><b><i>Subscribers</i></b><i>: 126,000 U-verse TV and Internet subscribers in service (as of end of 3Q07)<br/></i></div> <p style="margin-left: 40px;"><b><i>Homes Passed</i></b><i>: Approximately 5.5 million living units (as of end of 3Q07) </i></p>
    <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><b><i>Deployment</i></b><i>: Plans to pass approximately 8 million living units by the end of 2007Another interesting roll out to watch in 2008.<br/></i></div> <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><b><i>Schedule</i></b><i>: AT&amp;T expects to reach nearly 18 million households as part of its initial deployment by the end of 2008.</i> </div><br/><br/><font color="#cc0000">Mike: Speaking about FTTN - I know you recently blogged on Qwest and FTTN effort. Can you give us an update?</font><br/><br/>Qwest is based in Denver and provides services to 14 states in the western part of the U.S.<br/><br/>Earlier this week, <a id="xlro" href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/More-Qwest-VDSL-Details-90280" title="Broadband Reports">Broadband Reports</a>
posted an interesting summary of a conference call with new (he started
in August) Qwest CEO Ed Mueller. Here's a summary from the Broadband
Reports post:<br/><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>Qwest will spend $300 million over the next two years to bring 20Mbps VDSL to around 1.5 million customers.<br/></i><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>- $70-100 million will be spent on FTTN this year and another $200 million next year. </i> </div><i><br/>Qwest hopes to see a FTTN/VDSL penetration rate of 40% by 2010.</i> <i>Upgrades are going to cost the company around $175 per home. </i> <i>Qwest will focus on portions of around twenty un-mentioned markets.<br/></i></div><br/>The <a id="xg8l" href="http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_7742962" title="Denver Post">Denver Post</a> also published an article yesterday outlining the call and indicated the company will not focus on IP video delivery, stating <i>&quot;the</i> <i>$300 million fiber-to-the-node project is not intended as a deployment of IPTV.&quot;</i> Qwest currently has a video agreement with <a id="tqp1" href="http://www.directv.com/" title="DirectTV">DirectTV</a> and it looks like that agreement will stay in place.<br/><br/>The Post article gave a little more detail on deployment, stating the rollout <i>&quot;will focus on 20 markets with the project, 10 of its largest and 10 others.&quot; </i>Also according to the article, Qwest has started to upgrade their network in Denver and Colorado Springs.<br/><br/>Second
generation VDSL (Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Line), referred to
as VDSL2, provides up to 100Mbps over standard copper telephone wires.<br/><br/>These will be&nbsp; exciting products to watch in 2008.

]]></description>
<category>podcasts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=289965#</guid>
<author>gsnyder@stcc.edu</author>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/gsnyder/FTTN_FINAL.mp3" length="25601758" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>00:26:40</itunes:duration>
<itunes:keywords>Fiber Optics, Communications, Verizon, AT and T, Qwest, DSL, VDSL, VDSL2, Education, Broadband, Bandwidth</itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author>Gordon F Snyder Jr and Michael Qaissaunee</itunes:author>
<itunes:subtitle>We discuss AT&#38;T and Qwests Fiber to the Node projects.</itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fiber To The Home (FTTH) Technology Update [23:20]</title>
<link>http://gsnyder.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=286014#</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Mike Intro: Earlier this fall we
discussed DOCSIS 3.0 and how the cable companies will use this
technology to deliver high bandwidth services to consumers. In this
podcast we discuss the implementation and technologies the traditional
telephone companies are using to deliver-high bandwidth voice, video
and data services.</p>

<p><font color="#990000">Mike: Gordon,
I know you are very familiar with Verizon and the companies FiOS fiber
to the home ((FTTH) product. How is the project coming along?</font></p>

<p>FiOS is Verizon's Fiber to the Home (FTTH), also
know as Fiber to the Premise (FTTP) product offering. The service
provides high-bandwidth data, voice and video services. The company has
posted some interesting data on their <a title="policy blog" href="http://policyblog.verizon.com/PolicyBlog/Blogs/policyblog/CZBlogger1/391/FiOS-Fact-Sheet-Q307-Edition.aspx" id="a682">policy blog</a> for the third quarter of 2007. Here's a summary:</p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><b><i><u>Fiber Implementation</u></i></b><b><i>: </i></b><i>Source: </i></span><span style="font-size: 100%;"><a href="http://www.verizon.com/fiberoptics" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><i>http://www.verizon.com/fiberoptics</i></span></span></a></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 40px;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br/></span></p>

<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><i>FiOS
is currently available in parts of 16 states: California, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Virginia
and Washingto